Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?

[Editorial]

The World Is Ready For RoHS (Whether You Are Or Not)



Mark David  |   ED Online ID #12941  |   July 6, 2006

Article Rating:

The deadline for compliance with the EU's Restrictions on Hazardous Substances has arrived. Are your products RoHS ready? A survey of Electronic Design readers reveals a mixed bag (see the figure).

The elimination of lead and other hazardous substances has created some significant challenges for both chipmakers and OEM manufacturers. The additional costs and efforts have been worth it, though, because the RoHS directive is a big step forward in addressing the environmental impact the electronics industry has on our planet. Two watchdog groups monitoring U.S. progress on this front, the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) and the Computer Take Back Campaign (CTBC), make it their mission to promote public health, worker safety, and environmental issues.

The SVTC's goal is to raise the standards in the U.S. to become at least comparable to Europe and Japan. That means matching not only RoHS, but also the EU's law for the taking back of electronics by manufacturers the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE).

The SVTC says that the U.S. is making some progress in key areas, including toxic materials reduction and an increase in recycled and recoverable content. But our country still is the planet's largest producer of e-waste. According to the CTBC, as many as 600 million computers will soon be obsolete in the U.S.

MOUNTAINS OF MACHINES
As we all know, most of these computers are languishing in basements and attics. The CTBC says the mothballed devices could create a 22-story monolith of e-waste to cover the entire 472 square miles of Los Angeles sprawl and the pile would contain a total of more than 1.2 billion pounds of lead. Enough of these machines have already been thrown into the garbage to account for 40% of the heavy metals in landfills.

And our problem is global. Up to 80% of electronic waste is exported from the U.S. to countries such as China, India and Nigeria, where low-wage workers including children manually dismantle waste to recover some valuable materials. This results in extreme toxic exposure to the waste for workers, as well as in serious soil and water contamination, the SVTC reports.

New legislation is appearing in the U.S. But electronics manufacturers are concerned that without a federal bill, they could face a patchwork of up to 50 different regulations. Many states have introduced e-waste bills. Several have recycling laws on the books.

Washington and Maine laws require producers of electronics to pay the costs of collection, transportation, and recycling. In California, consumers pay a recycling fee of $10 per device at the point of purchase. The two models producer pay versus consumer pay are being debated at the national level here. Meanwhile, the WEEE directive makes manufacturers liable for products throughout their lifecycle.

HP and Dell get high marks from the SVTC because they have their own take-back programs. HP and Dell separated themselves from the rest of the manufacturers through their commitment to producer responsibility in the U.S., says the SVTC in its annual "report card". That sets a great precedent. Since HP is ranked as the largest buyer of electronic components, its environmental policies have a real impact.

Company-run take-back programs make good sense because they set the stage for thoughtful engineering methods to be applied to electronics recycling. As you readers know better than anyone, these products are complex, and they shouldn't be tossed into the trash can or smashed apart and melted down in the back alleys of Nigeria or China. They contain small quantities of diverse hazardous materials and require expertise in proper handling to safely optimize extraction and reuse.

Manufacturer take-back programs ensure that lifecycle concerns are fed back to the products designers, who may in turn consider alternatives in design and/or the development of new materials. The intelligent design that goes into the products can be matched by intelligent design in the recovery and reuse of components. What's more, intelligent disposal can be the basis for new, safe industry here in the U.S.

According to the International Association of Electronics Recyclers, 400 companies in the U.S. are considered electronics recyclers, a number that's sure to grow if the U.S. adopts a WEEE-like initiative of its own. That sure beats exporting the problem and outsourcing the recycling via an underground, unsafe cottage industry in the hidden corners of the globe.




Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?


  • A New Design Inflection Point
  • Forecasting Industry Growth For 2009 And Beyond
  • EDA Retools To Exploit Multicore Architectures
  • Design And Verification Move Up In Abstraction
  • EDA Retools To Exploit Multicore Architectures
  • A New Design Inflection Point
  • Design And Verification Move Up In Abstraction
  • Challenges Lurk For 22-nm Physical Implementation
    1) 1-A Switching Regulators Operate With 96% Efficiency To Replace Linear Regulators
    (501 views today)
    2) Build A Smart Battery Charger Using A Single-Transistor Circuit
    (306 views today)
    3) Battery Pack Improves Li-Ion Management For Electric Vehicles
    (303 views today)
    4) New Power Approaches May Fuel Analog Job Opportunities In Security And Health Applications
    (296 views today)
    5) Step-Down Switching Regulator Provides 60-V Input Transient Protection
    (148 views today)
    ALL TOP 20







    Reader Comments

    Some of the numbers aren't adding up. Dust off your calculators, gentlemen :)

    I started getting suspicious when I realized that the 600 million soon-to-obsolete computers are supposed to contain 1.2 billion pounds of lead. This implies an average of two pounds of lead in each obsolete computer. That number is surprising to me, but I can't disprove it.

    Checking the math on the "22-story monolith" section shows that some things are absolutely wrong. If a "story" of a building is about 8 feet high, then the 22 stories would be 176 feet high. Multiplying out the 472 square miles results in 472*5280*5280 square feet, or about 13 billion square feet. Multiply that by 176 feet high and you get about 2.3 trillion cubic feet.

    So basically, the claim is that each obsolete computer takes up an average of 3900 cubic feet. Something is clearly wrong.

    Let's assume for the moment that an average obsolete computer takes about 4 cubic feet. That would be 2.4 billion cubic feet for them all. Dividing this by the city of Los Angeles area of 13 billion square feet, the obsolete computer pile would be about 2.2 inches high.

    I don't doubt that lead in trash is a problem or that we need to do a better job of recycling obsolete computers. However, the cause is not helped by spreading numbers which can be proven as lies by anybody willing to use a calculator.

    I'm sure that Electronic Design simply reported the information as supplied by CTBC. However, a little checking would go a long way. As for the CTBC, one has to wonder about their motives.

    Allan Flippin -July 23, 2006   (Article Rating: )

    Where's "figure 1"? It doesn't show up.

    Anonymous -July 17, 2006

    1.2 BILLION pounds? Are you guys on crack?!? Let's put Lead use in proper perspective...out of all the industries worldwide, on a global scope, that use lead the electronics industry is responsible for using barely more than *1%*!!! That's a one, as in uno, as in singular.

    And we are not talking about pure lead being used in the electronics manufacturing process, it's an alloy of lead and tin (and possibly some other elements in small quantities). This means that not all lead used in electronics is exposed and available to be leached into the ground water because it is in "suspension" due to the fact that it's mixed with tin (which is not a RoHS controlled substance and is still the main element used in a "lead free" assembly process). So effectively there could be a potential impact on the envronment of maybe 1/10th of 1% improvement in lead contamination? Whoohoo!

    There is also more than just one type of "heavy metal", and the main contributors to ground water contamination are more likely to be cadmium, chromium, mercury, and the like, not lead. But in contrast to the above, removing lead from the electronics assembly process will increase the manufacturing costs and dramatically reduces the reliability and life expectancy of products. And no I'm not over-reacting, and people shouldn't brush these two facts off! The ovens that are used in a "lead free" process need to run significantly hotter (tin has a higher melting point - simple physics), which means more electricity, which means bigger power plants, which in contrast to the intent of RoHS ends up *adding* pollution to the environment! And the shorter product lifespan means *even more* consumer waste! (Using pure tin for solder joints is subject to cracking due to it's brittleness, and also shorting between electrical connections due to the growth of "tin whiskers" over time - again simple physics). Obviously the people in power responsible for creating the RoHS laws had a rather myopic view of things. I would bet that if someone took this data into account and weighed the overall effects on the environment it would turn out to actually make things worse! We're basically just moving the pollution from one spot to another.

    In my view the elimination of lead in electronics is a waste of time, money, and debate, and should be exempted from the RoHS requirements.

    And 1.2 billion pounds my ***.

    Anonymous -July 07, 2006
    Read more comments...

    POST YOUR COMMENTS HERE

    Name:

    Email:
    Rate this article:

     less useful more useful 
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    Your Comments:

    Enter the text from the image below




    Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.
     
     

    PartFinder

    Find real-time pricing, stock status, same-day/next-day shipping options and more. Brought to you by Digi-Key. Go to PartFinder.    
    GlobalSpec

    PART SEARCH :
    Powered by: GlobalSpec - The Engineering Search Engine
    Sponsored Links

    Electronic Design Europe Electronic Design China EEPN Power Electronics Auto Electronics Microwaves & RF
    Mobile Dev & Design Schematics Find Power Products Military Electronics EE Events Related Resources