Electronic Design

  
Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?


[Embedded in Electronic Design]
How Long Until We See The Prototype?

William Wong  |   ED Online ID #1568  |   March 4, 2002


I like hands-on evaluations because they provide a better idea about how well developers can make use of a tool. My background in hardware and software development lets me check out major features and see how hard it is to get a real application running.

Easy setup and fast prototyping can be key to a tool's acceptance and suitability. Simple, inexpensive tools have impressed me. Parallax's SX-Key, a tool for developing embedded applications for Ubicom's SX microcontrollers, and Rabbit Semiconductor's RabbitCore development kits are two examples.

But things get a little more difficult as processor performance and storage capacity increase. Software, such as a real-time operating system (RTOS) or a Java virtual machine, comes into play and integration gets harder.

So what should a developer do? Find a solution that delivers a higher level of integration. Board vendors are very well aware of this. Board support packages are standard fare, but what happens when a board shrinks to a system-on-a-chip (SoC)? The integration follows. Board vendors tend to stick with boards that give them greater power and performance by utilizing faster processors, and even SoCs. Still, off-the-shelf boards aren't always an alternative, especially when trying to integrate an SoC into a custom design that may be very small or part of a larger solution.

Integrating an RTOS with an SoC isn't a simple project. While this process is necessary for custom SoC designs, developers can typically find integrated solutions for off-the-shelf SoCs. The advantage is fast prototyping, and development kits are normally usable by developers immediately.

Support is another key advantage for an off-the-shelf integrated solution. SoC vendors are now responsible for integration problems. If the OS doesn't work, then the finger pointing is reduced. It's never eliminated unless the vendor builds both the SoC and OS, but that's rare. An OS is normally surrounded by a large toolset, and OS vendors are well entrenched.

So if that SoC-based prototype needs to be done yesterday....


Reprints   Printer-Friendly  Email this Article  RSS    Font Size   What's This?


  • Network-On-Chip Tools Arrive for The Masses
  • Tackling System Design Challenges Through Early Verification
  • ESL Tools Take Center Stage As Designers Move Up
  • Parasitic Extraction Tool Targets Next-Generation Custom ICs
  • Synopsys Jumps Into ESL-Synthesis Pool
  • Verify Control Systems Before Committing To Hardware
  • You're Using How Many FPGAs?
  • Tool Up For The FPGA Blitz
    1) Build A Smart Battery Charger Using A Single-Transistor Circuit
    (178 views today)
    2) Hot Hands For Some Cool Rock: Motion Sensing Meets Audio Engineering
    (168 views today)
    3) What's All This Transimpedance Amplifier Stuff, Anyhow? (Part 1)
    (92 views today)
    4) GPS-Derived Grandmaster Clock Delivers Ultra-Precise Time And Frequency Sync
    (83 views today)
    5) Downconverting Mixers Lower Power Consumption While Improving Performance
    (63 views today)
    ALL TOP 20



    POST YOUR COMMENTS HERE
    Name:

    Email:
    Your Comments:

    Enter the text from the image below


    Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.

    Search Electronic Design
         
      
     
    Web Seminar
    Sponsored By:
    Title: Read Pacing: A Performance Enhancing Feature of PCI Express Gen 2 Switch Devices
    Speakers: 
    Date: 07/01/08
    Register: 

    Electronic Design Europe Electronic Design China EEPN Power Electronics Auto Electronics Microwaves & RF
    Mobile Dev & Design Schematics Find Power Products Military Electronics EE Events Related Resources