Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?

[Ideas For Design]

Low-Power Solid-State Airflow Detector



W. Stephen Woodward  |   ED Online ID #4294  |   January 22, 2001

Article Rating: Not Rated

Explicit airflow detection is essential in many applications. High power-density electronics are liable to overheat and self-destruct when cooling-fan failures go unnoticed. Heating and air-conditioning systems often incorporate multipoint monitoring of ventilation-duct flow. Clean-room air-handling systems with undetected dirty, blocked air filters can ruin process yield. Laboratory fume hoods can contain volatile solvents or toxic reagents, making adequate air turn-over critical to safety.

In these and similar scenarios, the consequences of undetected airflow interruption can range from the merely expensive to the frankly dangerous. Therefore, it becomes necessary to use some reliable means for airflow detection. Usually, either a mechanical pressure-actuated vane switch or one of the various types of heat-transfer-based airflow sensors is employed.

An advantage of thermal sensors is that they contain no moving parts. But they often require several watts of heating input to run hot enough to overcome ambient temperature variations. The detector described here is a power-thrifty member of the thermal genre. It employs an ambient-compensated airflow-detection scheme based on differential heating of a series-connected transistor pair (Fig. 1).

In operation, 200-mV reference regulator A1 maintains a constant Q1/Q2 current drive equal to 40 mA (i.e., 200 mV/R1). Since the two transistors pass the same current, their relative power dissipations are determined solely by their respective VCE voltages. For the circuit constants shown, these power levels work out to 4 V × 40 mA = 160 mW for Q1 and 0.75 V × 40 mA = 30 mW for Q2. The 130-mW heat-flow difference leads to a temperature difference determined by the heat-dissipation-versus-airspeed characteristics of the 2N4401's plastic TO-92 package. The TO-92's thermal-impedance-versus-airspeed characteristic is well approximated by the simple equation shown in Figure 2:

ZT = ZJ + 1/(SC + KT√AF )

where:

ZT = "total immersion" junction-to-case thermal impedance = 44°C/W

SC = still-air case-to-ambient conductivity = 6.4 mW/°C

KT = "King's Law" thermal diffusion constant = 750 µW/°C−√fpm

AF = airspeed in ft./min.

Therefore, the Q1/Q2 temperature differential ranges from 130 mW × 200°C/W = 26°C at 0 fpm (zero flow), to 130 mW × 75°C/W = 10°C at 1200 fpm (the 14-mph breeze found at the output face of a typical 100-cfm cooling fan). This flow-dependent temperature differential gives rise to a flow-dependent VBE differential via the 2N4401's typical-transistor VBE temperature coefficient of −2 mV/°C. Comparator A2 matches this Q1VBE/Q2VBE ratio to R2/R3. Under high airflow, Q1 is cool and Q1VBE/Q2VBE > R2/R3, which makes A2's output high (i.e., "flow OK"). With a stagnant airflow (as might connote fan failure, flue fouling, or filter fill-up) Q1 is allowed to heat up, driving Q1VBE/Q2VBE < R2/R3. This causes A2's output to slew low, asserting the low-flow fault-alarm condition.

For these circuit constants, the no-flow alarm threshold is 100 fpm (Fig. 1, again). But this "line in the sand" can be easily adjusted. Raising Q1's power dissipation by boosting collector current increases the threshold. Setting R1 = 4 Ω, for instance, would bump Q1's power input to 200 mW and quadruple the low-airspeed setpoint to 400 fpm. Increasing R1 allows the setpoint to be moved the other way (toward a lower flow level). For example, R1 = 6.4 Ω would cool Q1 to a tepid 125 mW and thereby quarter the no-go flow criteria to 25 fpm.

Besides being adaptable to different flow rates, the circuit also can accept different supply voltages. In these cases, R1 must be multiplied by (V+ − 1)/4 to hold Q1's IC × VC heating level constant. Note that a different supply rail also will change the minimum voltage rating needed for A1/A2. LM10Ls are rated for 7 V maximum, while LT1635s are rated for as high as 14 V. The LM10 can tolerate up to 45 V.




Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?


  • Network-On-Chip Tools Arrive for The Masses
  • Tackling System Design Challenges Through Early Verification
  • ESL Tools Take Center Stage As Designers Move Up
  • Parasitic Extraction Tool Targets Next-Generation Custom ICs
  • Synopsys Jumps Into ESL-Synthesis Pool
  • Verify Control Systems Before Committing To Hardware
  • You're Using How Many FPGAs?
  • Tool Up For The FPGA Blitz
    1) Build A Smart Battery Charger Using A Single-Transistor Circuit
    (184 views today)
    2) Hot Hands For Some Cool Rock: Motion Sensing Meets Audio Engineering
    (168 views today)
    3) GPS-Derived Grandmaster Clock Delivers Ultra-Precise Time And Frequency Sync
    (73 views today)
    4) What's All This Transimpedance Amplifier Stuff, Anyhow? (Part 1)
    (70 views today)
    5) Bidirectional H-Bridge DC-Motor Motion Controller
    (64 views today)
    ALL TOP 20







    POST YOUR COMMENTS HERE

    Name:

    Email:
    Rate this article:

     less useful more useful 
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    Your Comments:

    Enter the text from the image below




    Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.
    (Acceptable Use Policy)
     
     

    PartFinder

    Find real-time pricing, stock status, same-day/next-day shipping options and more. Brought to you by Digi-Key. Go to PartFinder.    
    GlobalSpec

    PART SEARCH :
    Powered by: GlobalSpec - The Engineering Search Engine
    Sponsored Links

    Electronic Design Europe Electronic Design China EEPN Power Electronics Auto Electronics Microwaves & RF
    Mobile Dev & Design Schematics Find Power Products Military Electronics EE Events Related Resources