Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?

[Design View / Design Solution]

When Is It Best To Use VXI, PXI, Or GPIB For Your System?



Andy Toth  |   ED Online ID #7495  |   March 15, 2004

Article Rating: Not Rated

DESIGN VIEW is the summary of the complete DESIGN SOLUTION contributed article, which begins on Page 2.

Choosing the right platform (or combination of platforms) for your ATE system can save you money and labor—plus improve measurement results. You can assemble an instrumentation system in several different ways. One option is to "rack and stack" standalone boxes and connect them to a computer via the well known General Purpose Interface Bus (GPIB), also called the IEEE-488 bus. This makes it simple to swap out instruments and create new configurations quickly and easily.

Another route is to use instruments on VME eXtensions for Instrumentation (VXI) and PCI eXtensions for Instrumentation (PXI) cards that plug into a backplane. Such a solution seems ideal, with the computer and the instruments it controls all in the same card cage. However, not all instruments are availlable as plug-in cards.

Experience has shown that it's seldom possible to put together a complete system using all bus-based or all standalone instruments. Generally, there will be some of both.

This article reviews each of the platforms in detail, discussing their benefits and limitations. It also gets into the mixing and matching of the buses for an optimal solution.

With so many choices, it's possible to put together a system to meet just about any need. It's nice to know, too, that these technologies will stick around for a long time.

HIGHLIGHTS:
GPIB The General Purpose Bus Interface is a byte-serial, bit-parallel bus that can connect up to 15 devices to one controller. GPIB has a huge installed base, making instrument connection a snap. It's primary drawback is limited bandwidth.
VXI VXI, which is based on the VMEbus, works with signals ranging from low-level analog to microwave. It offers the advantages of performance and ruggedness, but it could cost two to three times more than alternatives
PXI PXI, based on CompactPCI, falls midway in complexity between GPIB and VXI. PXI lets users standardize cards and card cages. And because it's based on the PC architecture, software is readily available. Limitations include space inside the enclosure, as well as power and density. Also, GPIB equipment is often needed to complete a test setup.
Combining Buses Mixing and matching standalone boxes, VXI, and PXI is probably the most optimal solution. Because systems can connect to each other via GPIB and to the world via Ethernet, this circumvents VXI's and PXI's inability to supply or handle enough power.

Full article begins on Page 2




<-- prev. page     [1] 2 3 4     next page -->

Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?


  • In EDA, A Year Of Mergers, Failed And Otherwise
  • 2008 BEST Electronic Design Winners
  • Engineers Rely On Internet For Product Info
  • Rochester Electronics Establishes New Design and Technology Group
  • November 17, 2008
  • Custom Sources Light Way To 22-nm IC Lithography
  • Software Turns Scopes Into Vector RF Signal Analyzers
  • Couple’s $15 Million Gift Advances Rice Engineering Education
    1) Switch-Mode ICs Promote Efficient Power Management, Part 1: Switch-Mode Fundamentals
    (1144 views today)
    2) Ubuntu Goes Embedded
    (269 views today)
    3) Build A Smart Battery Charger Using A Single-Transistor Circuit
    (264 views today)
    4) Parts Add Up To Home Theater PC
    (236 views today)
    5) Ten Top Design Skills For Tough Times
    (180 views today)
    ALL TOP 20







    Reader Comments

    Can you compare the performance of the VME backplane with VXI backplanes.

    What are the advantages and disadvantages of each with the another one? Can the VXI can be applied in Real Time Simulation systems?

    Madhusudan N -July 20, 2004

    This is a very good introductory article. I would like to see follow-on articles which more clearly define when to use each bus depending on the application or instrument. Also would like to see more hyperlinks to references.

    Ron Grover -May 06, 2004

    This article is very useful in summarizing the 3 main ATE bus architectures and their features. Its weakness is not being more definitive about the comparisons between the approaches, often citing undefined sources. Compact PCI was addressed only summarily. Nevertheless, this is a valuable reference article. I am glad to see ATE topics addressed in ED. Regards

    Roland Hassun -March 27, 2004
    Read more comments...

    POST YOUR COMMENTS HERE

    Name:

    Email:
    Rate this article:

     less useful more useful 
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    Your Comments:

    Enter the text from the image below




    Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.
     
     

    PartFinder

    Find real-time pricing, stock status, same-day/next-day shipping options and more. Brought to you by Digi-Key. Go to PartFinder.    
    GlobalSpec

    PART SEARCH :
    Powered by: GlobalSpec - The Engineering Search Engine
    Sponsored Links

    Electronic Design Europe Electronic Design China EEPN Power Electronics Auto Electronics Microwaves & RF
    Mobile Dev & Design Schematics Find Power Products Military Electronics EE Events Related Resources