Electronic Design

  
Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?


[TechView: The Industry]
Designers Must Look At Multiple Metrics To Pick The Best Core Silicon

Jordan Selburn  |   ED Online ID #7626  |   March 29, 2004


Designers make few choices more important than selecting which chip or chips will perform the basic functions that define their systems' functionality. These chips, the "core silicon" of the system, can be any one of a variety of different types of ICs, such as ASICs, programmable logic devices (PLDs), or application-specific standard products (ASSPs).

Frequently, designers only consider ASICs and PLDs in evaluating the various alternatives for core silicon. This is understandable because engineers, being very creative, want to add unique features and value to their systems. Assessing the ASIC-PLD tradeoff, managers—if not design engineers—first tend to ask what these parts will cost.

Using cost as the only selection criterion results in a one-dimensional view of core silicon. PLDs, with their low nonrecurring engineering costs, should have all of the low-volume designs, and ASICs, with lower unit prices, the high-volume sockets. It is important to consider the true total cost, i.e., not just mask costs but the even more significant logic design, physical design, and verification costs.

Other factors may be equally or more important than cost, like system performance, time-to-market, system integration, schedule and cost risk, and supply-chain implications. Silicon cell-based ASICs generally win in performance and power consumption and allow for the incorporation of many more different types of functions on a single piece of silicon than PLDs. Time-to-market and schedule risk considerations, however, favor a PLD approach. And as commodity parts, PLDs have a supply chain advantage over the sole-source, sole-customer ASICs.

The ultimate criterion for choosing the type of IC to use for core silicon is where the value resides in the end system. If the system is feature-driven, where silicon can differentiate the end product, then ASICs or PLDs have the edge. Products that have become more commodity-like or are standards-driven are ideal candidates for ASSPs, and the move to these solutions is becoming a more significant trend in core silicon than just ASICs versus PLDs.

iSuppli Corp.
www.isuppli.com


Reprints   Printer-Friendly  Email this Article  RSS    Font Size   What's This?


  • Engineers Rely On Internet For Product Info
  • Rochester Electronics Establishes New Design and Technology Group
  • Custom Sources Light Way To 22-nm IC Lithography
  • In EDA, A Year Of Mergers, Failed And Otherwise
  • Software Turns Scopes Into Vector RF Signal Analyzers
  • Couple’s $15 Million Gift Advances Rice Engineering Education
  • November 7, 2008
  • Startup Sets Sail For Speedier Spice Simulation
    1) Ten Top Design Skills For Tough Times
    (2496 views today)
    2) Build A Smart Battery Charger Using A Single-Transistor Circuit
    (313 views today)
    3) Energy Harvester Perpetually Powers WIreless Sensors
    (273 views today)
    4) Ultracapacitors Branch Out Into Wider Markets
    (243 views today)
    5) Easily Convert Decimal Numbers To Their Binary And BCD Formats
    (162 views today)
    ALL TOP 20



    POST YOUR COMMENTS HERE
    Name:

    Email:
    Your Comments:

    Enter the text from the image below


    Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.

    Search Electronic Design
         
      
     
    Web Seminar
    Sponsored By:
    Title: Read Pacing: A Performance Enhancing Feature of PCI Express Gen 2 Switch Devices
    Speakers: 
    Date: 07/01/08
    Register: 

    Electronic Design Europe Electronic Design China EEPN Power Electronics Auto Electronics Microwaves & RF
    Mobile Dev & Design Schematics Find Power Products Military Electronics EE Events Related Resources