[POV: Point Of View]
Change Is The Only Constant In Electronic Components
Carol Williams
ED Online ID #15458
May 10, 2007
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
Electronic components (ECs) are so widely distributed that the EC industry feels
every economic shift, twitch, and tremor. That's especially true for small to
medium-sized EC companies. Whether it's a change in consumer spending
habits, government budgets, or boom and bust cycles in different sectors, small companies always feel the effect first.
Three industry trends—supplier consolidation, vendor reduction, and China's
emerging economic presence—provide a good case in point.
THE BIG GET BIGGER
Supplier consolidation will continue. As the big get bigger, they will continue acquiring smaller companies while expanding their presence overseas. The negative impact on the overall EC marketplace is undeniable. Strains on
supply/distribution chains will increase. There will be less innovation as players (especially small ones) are removed from the
field. And, prices will rise for everyone, from small manufacturers to end users.
When big companies grow into goliaths, however, they tend
to be less customer-friendly. This creates wonderful opportunities for smaller, more nimble EC companies to gain customers
alienated by GoliathCo, despite the attendant economies of
scale. Big is not always better, nor is value determined by price
alone. This is when smaller companies should step forward
confidently and do what they do best: provide service to their
customers with a capital S.
OLD SOLUTION, NEW NAME
Vendor reduction is a
trend that keeps many electronic components professionals up
at night. It's just a new name for the cost-cutting bandwagon
that companies have jumped on (often recklessly) for over a
decade. Yet as trends go, it has about run its course.
As with other industry fads, it has created many unexpected
downsides while failing to live up to its early hype. Yes, maintaining relationships with numerous vendors is expensive. But
haphazard or shortsighted vendor reduction is much more
costly in the long run. For example, slashing one's ties with
multiple vendors can potentially isolate a company from new
technologies and innovative solutions, which often emerge in
secondary, smaller companies first.
The opportunity here? Intelligent, strategic vendor reduction.
An optimum vendor-customer relationship is one in which both
parties realize they need each other, value their respective roles, and commit to achieving mutual goals.
Helping customers reach this optimum vendor balance is a value-add even the smallest
EC distributor can provide. In fact, small and
nimble are tremendous qualities.
THE NEXT MONSTER UNDER THE
BED
China's entrance onto the
world stage has been anything but
nimble, profoundly and rapidly altering the global economic landscape.
But the business going there
remains predominately high-volume and geared for mass-market consumer products. That's
unlikely to dramatically change in the next few years.
While this is hurting larger U.S. EC companies, it has opened
numerous new doors for enterprising, medium-sized domestic
firms. Many are taking advantage of the talent pool created by
massive staff reductions among the largest U.S. companies.
That may strike some as opportunistic, but it's not. It's just
one element of a larger economic cycle in which periods of
consolidation are followed by corresponding periods of decentralization. Thank goodness someone is around to pick up the
pieces while it's happening.
Anyone who has experienced similar economic ups and
downs knows that everything is cyclical. Trends come and go.
History repeats itself, but never exactly the same way. A few
decades ago, the burgeoning Japanese economy seemed
poised to steamroll over the U.S. and end the American way of
life as we know it. Then it was Taiwan. Then Korea. And yet the
U.S. is still here, albeit changed certainly, but still a strong presence. Is China simply the next one? Time, of course, will tell.
Change is a given. Yet a company's attitude toward economic
variations can mean the difference between success and failure.
A positive, "solutions-centric" attitude alone won't cause unwanted economic realities to disappear in a puff of smoke. It can,
however, profoundly alter one's reaction to them.
|