[Technology Report]
Leading The Charge
The popularity of electric vehicles rises as battery and fuel-cell technologies improve.
William Wong
ED Online ID #15859
June 29, 2007
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
Forget about those old gas guzzlers. Electric and hybrid
vehicles are hitting the streets. A driving factor is consumer environmental concern, but improved technology has really made the difference—especially in
motors, motor control, batteries, and power management. Now, the biggest challenge lies in matching consumer expectations and use to new products that
don't operate like fossil-fuel-powered vehicles (see table).
Motor companies are meeting that challenge. Tesla Motors' all-electric
Roadster rivals high-performance two-seaters from Porsche, Ferrari, and other sports car companies (Fig. 1). It does 0 to 60 mph in four seconds and
has a range of 250 miles/charge, getting the equivalent of 135 mpg.
Tesla needs to check its rear-view mirror, though, for concept cars looking to steal its thunder—such as the Chevy Volt, which can run on electricity or biodiesel (see "Volt Charges Up The Crowd In Detroit") and the hydrogen-powered Honda
FCX. And when it comes to hybrids, Toyota's popular Prius embodies the state of the art (see "Setting The Standard For Hybrid Cars").
It's Electric
Tesla's 2600-lb Roadster uses a custom 77-lb
motor (Fig. 2). The three-phase, four-pole ac induction motor redlines at 13,500 rpm. It has a peak power of 248 hp (185 kW).
Also, it's tied to a clutchless, manual two-speed gearbox that gives it that
four-second 0- to 60-mph takeoff.
The Roadster doesn't have a reverse gear. Instead, it runs the motor in
the opposite direction. It's probably the only high-performance vehicle that
runs as fast in reverse as it does in drive. The motor also is used for regenerative braking.
Key to Tesla's system is the ESS (energy storage system). The 950-lb ESS
packs an array of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries and a host of electronics,
including 13 microprocessors that provide redundant support. Each 831 Li-ion cell is monitored and can be bypassed. The system is liquid-cooled so the
electronics can optimize the thermal characteristics. It also checks for
smoke, excessive heat, and other failure modes.
Drivers can charge the ESS with 220 V and Tesla's fast, self adjusting,
onboard charger (Fig. 3). A full recharge takes 3.5 hours. Drivers also can
use a standard 110-V circuit, but that may take as long as 12 hours, depending upon the amount of current that can be drawn. The breakaway charging
cable has a number of safety interlock features. If you're looking to shut power companies completely out of your driving, check out solar cells for charging, if they can get about 56 kW.
David Vesrini of Tesla Motors estimates that the ESS locked up about 40%
of the research dollars for the Roadster. He also notes that Li-ion batteries
are improving at a rate of about 8% per year. This means that when the ESS
and motor bearings need to be replaced at 100,000 miles, Roadster owners
will essentially upgrade to a less expensive vehicle with even longer range.
But when it comes to R&D for electric vehicles, the overall economy
and efficiency from source to use must be considered (Fig. 4). Even accounting for the power it draws
from the grid, the Roadster tops its
hybrid competitors with a 1.14km/MJ well-to-wheel efficiency. In
addition to recharge time and travel
distance, the Roadster leads the
way in performance (Fig. 5), which
will be a major selling point.
Starting at $92,000, the Roadster is expensive compared to most
automobiles on the road. But it's a
bargain compared to its competition. Code named DarkStar, the
Roadster is just becoming available
in limited quantities. And it's just
the beginning for the company,
whose WhiteStar project will be a
four-door, five-passenger vehicle
with a starting price that's expected
to be half the Roadster's. Look for it
in 2010 as Tesla Motors moves into
the mainstream.
Hydrogen And Hybrids
Fully electric vehicles have been
around for some time, but they've
had less commercial success than
energy-efficient vehicles that incorporate fossil fuels. Ethanol may get a
lot of press as a replacement for fossil fuels, but some companies are
pushing hydrogen instead, especially
in electric vehicles.
Unfortunately, the use of hydrogen is comparable to a storage system like a battery. Oil and coal have
energy that can be released through
oxidation. It takes energy to mine
and process these substances, usually at a fraction of the energy they
can deliver.
On the other hand, hydrogen
must be obtained from other
means, like electrolyzing water. This
takes more energy than is released
when the hydrogen is utilized in a
fuel cell. The hydrogen model may
only be a more efficient storage system than some batteries.
Still, many prototypes are being
built around the assumption that hydrogen will be readily available. For example, Honda's FCX
concept car uses a fuel cell that runs on hydrogen (Fig. 6). The
hydrogen is stored in a high-pressure tank, and the system
uses an ultracapacitor to even out the power requirements as
the engine accelerates or when regenerative braking generates power.
Hybrids, however, are still the fuel-efficient vehicle-of-choice
since they can meet buyers' range and performance requirements, as is evidenced by the Toyota Prius. But unlike Honda's
Civic and Accord hybrids, the Prius starts with its electric motor
and uses the gas engine as backup, essentially making it an
electric vehicle. In fact, some Prius owners have hacked their
rides to run exclusively on batteries.
The Volt is another interesting hybrid because it is strictly an
electric vehicle for short hauls under 40 miles, but uses its fossil-fuel engine to charge the batteries for longer hauls. The engine
can utilize a range of fuels.
Design Challenges
A number of challenges remain for
both hybrids and fully electric vehicles. Capacity alone is not enough.
The technology should require minimal maintenance. Additionally, it
must safely survive accidents. These
systems need to be rugged and able
to endure a wide range of temperatures as well.
Hybrid vehicles tend to have an
intricate mechanical design that's
more complex than fully electric solutions like the Roadster. Their system
redundancy, energy storage systems,
and electrical engine control are only
somewhat similar. While cars don't
balance on two wheels, a comparable solution can be found in the fully
electric single-passenger vehicle,
Dean Kamen's Segway Human
Transporter (Fig. 7; see "Smart
Motion Makes For A Smarter
Design,").
Since it's also a robotics platform (see "Segway's Concept Centaur:
Computer Controlled Mobility
Leads To New Concepts,"), its design addresses similar challenges faced by electric and
hybrid vehicle designers.
For example, the Segway platforms employ numerous processors
for control (Fig. 8). A number of
these processors, though, simply
monitor the system. While this
leads to better efficiency, safety,
and reliability, the design can get
complex because of the number of
subsystems involved.
Multiprocessing programming
challenges can be as difficult to solve
as improving the performance and
reliability of the energy storage system. Low-cost 8- and 16-bit microcontrollers are meeting the needs at this
point, but the falling prices of 32-bit
platforms will change transportation's architectural landscape over
the next few years.
SEGWAY TRANSPORTER (see figure) |
Style: one person standing |
Range: 16 to 24 miles |
Speed: 12.5 mph |
Carrying capacity: 100 to 260 lb |
Motors: two brushless dc servomotors |
Battery: two Saphion lithium-ion battery packs |
Ground clearance: 3 in. |
Turning radius: 0 in. |
Weight: 105 lb |
Footprint: 19 by 25 in. |
Tires: 19-in. puncture-resistant tire |
Price: starting at $5000 |
|
TESLA MOTORS ROADSTER (see figure) |
Style: two-seat, open-top, rear-drive roadster |
Top speed: more than 130 mph |
Acceleration: 0-60mph in about 4 seconds |
Range: approximately 250 miles/charge |
Drivetrain: electric motor with two-speed electric-shift manual transmission with
integral differential, traction control |
Transmission: |
Gear |
Ratio |
Overall |
First |
4.20:1 |
14.3:1 |
Second |
2.17:1 |
7.4:1 |
Final |
3.41:1 |
|
Motor: three-phase, four-pole electric motor; 248-hp peak (185 kW); redline at 13,500 rpm; regenerative "engine braking" |
Front suspension: telescopic damper unit; anti-roll bar |
Rear suspension: independent; upper and lower wishbone; co-axial coil
spring/telescopic damper |
Brakes: four-wheel disc brakes with ABS |
Chassis: bonded extruded aluminum with four-wheel wishbone suspension |
Dimensions: overall length 155.4 in.; width 73.7 in.; height 44.4 in. |
Wheelbase: 92.6 in. |
Curb weight: around 2690 lb |
Lights: halogen low- and high-beam headlamp assemblies, LED tail lights |
Energy storage system: lithium-ion batteries, 3.5-hour minimum recharge time,
expected lifetime in excess of 100,000 miles, microprocessor controlled, heater for
cold weather charging to 20°C |
Security: PIN for operating the vehicle; valet mode restricts speed, acceleration,
and distance |
Price: starting at $92,000 |
|
|