[Engineering Feature]
Keeping Troops Out Of Harm's Way, Technically Speaking
Emerging technologies aim to improve safety and emergency care on battlefields and beyond.
John Edwards
ED Online ID #16408
September 1, 2007
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
In one memorable scene in the 1951 movie
The Day the Earth Stood Still, the giant
robot Gort picks up the body of his companion Klaatu and cradles the alien visitor in his
arms. The robot then carries Klaatu back to
the safety of their flying saucer for life-restoring treatment. Now, life is imitating art.
A giant mobile robot developed by Vecna
Technologies is able to use its arms to rescue
injured soldiers from the battlefield. "I am very
excited about the potential of this robot to not
only save lives by going out and rescuing people,
but to save lives by doing jobs that are unnecessarily dangerous," says Daniel Theobald, president and chief technology officer of Vecna.
Most military-funded research focuses on
developing or improving weapons systems. But
as the nation continues fighting a dual-front war
in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Department of
Defense is increasingly turning its attention
inward and actively supporting research designed
to improve soldiers' well-being. "The military
has shown that they're committed to soldiers' safety," says Theobald.
IN GORT'S FOOTSTEPS
Vecna's robot mirrors much of
Gort's functionality—except for the ability to fire disintegrator rays. Funded by the Army's Telemedicine and Advanced
Technology Research Center, the Battlefield Extraction
Robot (BEAR) walks on two legs, climbs stairs, and lifts
objects equivalent to the size and weight of a fully outfitted
soldier (Fig. 1).
Theobald notes that the remotely controlled BEAR is
markedly different from other military robots, which are
either vehicle-sized or small enough to be toys. "There wasn't
anything in the middle," he says. "There was a real lack of
robotic capability that addressed this critical area—a robot
that can... actually interact with the environment, lift things,
carry things, move things of significant weight."
A prototype BEAR incorporated a single hydraulic arm
that could lift nearly 300 lb. Vecna recently demonstrated
an improved model that cradled a human-sized dummy in
two arms as it climbed up and down stairs. The most recent
system's arms function like a forklift, sliding under objects
and people before lifting them up. Theobald says future
models will include articulated hands for gently scooping
up casualties.
Standing 6 ft tall, BEAR features an array of high-tech
hardware, including microprocessors, analog-to-digital converters, optical encoders, pressure sensors, and ultrasonic
and infrared range finders. "In the current head we have two
cameras—a night-vision camera and an active, infrared camera that can actually see heat," says Theobald.
For a big guy, BEAR is surprisingly mobile. Wheels on its
feet, knees, and hips allow it to roll smoothly over level
ground. Alternatively, thigh- and shin-mounted tracks enable
it to move over rough terrain or stairs in a crouching or
kneeling position.
The robot's most incongruous feature is its teddy-bear-like
head, which is designed to comfort and reassure casualties
(or perhaps help them laugh through their pain). "The troops
will get used to it," says Theobald. "The troops will be
dependent on [the robot] and will have a connection to it."
Besides rescuing fallen soldiers, BEAR could also be used
for various dangerous military and civilian tasks that would
expose humans to excessive risk, such as removing unexploded ammo, patrolling a nuclear facility, or retrieving important items from a burning building. "OSHA and mine safety
people are very interested," says Theobald.
A SHOT IS HEARD
While Vecna's robot is designed to
rescue wounded soldiers, other new technology may keep
troops from getting injured in the first place. An associate
professor of electrical and computer engineering at Montana State University, Rob Maher is investigating how sound—
specifically, the sound of gunshots—can save soldiers from
sniper fire and other battlefield hazards. "Over the years
there has been a lot of interest in trying to figure out where a
bullet is going once it comes out of a rifle," he says.
Maher's goal is to pave the way for devices that would tell
users, almost instantly, a gunshot's direction and distance. A
soldier could then pinpoint a sniper's exact location after just
a single shot was fired. Such a unit would feature two or
more microphones to detect the gunshot from slightly different positions, as well as a small computer to make the necessary calculations.
"Sound travels at a relatively slow rate compared to the
speed of electronics these days, so determining the relative
time of the soundwaves' arrival at those different microphones is not particularly difficult any more," says Maher.
"Using a computer to figure out the time differences and then
predicting for a given trajectory how long that soundwave
path would be, that's the procedure."
Boomerang, a gunfire detection system from BBN Technologies, already uses sound-analysis technology to calculate
shot paths. The device indicates the range and elevation of
incoming gunfire on an LED screen display. The system,
which also announces the gunfire's direction with a recorded
voice, features a set of microphones mounted to an aluminum stand. "It looks like a small, very sparse Christmas
tree," says Maher. "It's under a meter tall."
Currently being used in Iraq and Afghanistan, Boomerang
can be set up outside a building or tent or mounted to a
HUMV (Fig. 2). Future detection systems will be even more
accurate, able to work with a wider range of weapons, and
small enough to be held in a soldier's hand.
Maher notes that gunfire analysis is merely the first step in
creating even more sophisticated sound detection systems.
"A gunshot's intense energy and distinctness make it an ideal
signal for rapid analysis," he says. Other sounds aren't as
easy to pick apart, however.
"The military would like to have some sort of deployable
surveillance," says Maher, "where the systems would have
enough intelligence to distinguish between the sound of a
Jeep driving by, or a horse walking through tall grass, or
somebody creeping up on hands and knees."
Maher believes such technology will someday allow soldiers, as well as civilian police officers and security guards, to
respond quickly to a wide range of suspicious sounds. He
notes that working on gunfire detection is good practice for
developing other types of noise-recognition systems.
"My feeling is that if we can't develop our software and our
algorithms to work reliably with these very distinctive [gun-fire] sounds, then we're likely not going
to have much luck trying to distinguish
very subtle changes," says Maher.
SHOCK DETECTOR
As wounded
soldiers are brought to care stations
and field hospitals, one of the crucial
tasks facing medics, nurses, and physicians is accurately judging each patient's condition. All too often,
injured soldiers are judged "stable" at
field sites, and then they destabilize
during flights to long-term health-care
facilities located in Germany or the U.S.
"If we think somebody is stabilized,
but they're not, they're going to go
downhill fast," says Babs Soler, a professor of anesthesiology at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in
Worcester, Mass. "You can continually
monitor people in hospitals, but it's
really difficult if you put somebody on
a helicopter or airplane."
To improve survival rates, Soler
developed a portable gadget that can
spot the signs of shock long before a
soldier begins to develop symptoms of
the life-threatening condition. "The
military has been looking for a long
time at trying to be able to non-invasively monitor soldiers who are at risk
for having serious medical problems,
like shock," she says. "You want to
know as early as possible when somebody has internal bleeding."
Based on optoelectronic technology,
Soler's device detects incipient shock by
monitoring three key indicators: oxygen and acid levels in muscles as well as
the volume of red cells in the patient's
blood, all without the need for blood
draws or incisions. It comprises a console and disposable sensor that provides rapid and continual monitoring
via near-infrared reflected light.
"A spectrometer measures just how
much light there is at each wavelength," Soler says. "The computer
contains three mathematic equations
that analyze the spectrum to report on
the three parameters."
The monitor is designed to stay
attached to patients until they reach a
fully staffed and equipped hospital.
"Hopefully, the numbers stay normal
throughout the entire transport," says
Soler. If not, an alarm sounds to alert a
nearby caregiver that anti-shock treatment is required.
"They would look at the numbers as
well as other information they might
have to figure out how to treat the
patient," says Soler.
Soler's research was funded in part
by a grant from the U.S. Department of
Defense's Peer Reviewed Medical
Research Program. Congress created
the program in 1999 to promote military health research. Soler and her company, Reflectance Medical, are now
seeking FDA approval for the device
with the hope of marketing it to civilian
EMT squads and trauma centers
nationwide. "We hope this will be near
every ICU bed," she says.
One has to wonder if Gort used such a
device to monitor Klaatu's recovery.
|