[Leapfrog: First Look]
Dueling 12-Bit ADCs Make Their Debut
Don Tuite
ED Online ID #18166
February 28, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
The highest demand and the most vigorous competition
between companies that make analog-todigital
converters (ADCs) lie in the sampling range
from 50 to 65 Msamples/s in 10- and 12-bit resolutions.
Market demand is highest for eight- and 10-channel
devices with the lowest possible power consumption
per channel.
In late January, within days of each other, Texas Instruments
and National Semiconductor announced groundbreaking
new chips for that market segment. In terms
of wow-factor, National took some of the wind out
of TI’s sails by developing its chip in an entirely
new architecture for commercial applications:
continuous-time delta-sigma.
Partly due to the new architecture, there was a
dramatic development. Where TI had announced
chips that use 30% less power than their closest
competitor (of the week before), National’s chips use 30%
less power again.
TI’s 12-bit ADS5281 (50 Msamples/s), 12-bit ADS5282
(65 Msamples/s), and 10-bit ADS5287 (65 Msamples/s)
cost $60.00, $68.40, and $40.00 in lots of 100, but
only the ADS5281 was available for sampling as of late
January. Sampling now, National’s 12-bit, 50-Msample/s
ADC12EU050 costs $64.00 in 1000-unit quantities.
HEAD TO HEAD
TI’s chips offer scalable power dissipation that ranges
from 48 mW/channel at 30 Msamples/s to 55 mW at
40 Msamples/s; 64 mW at 50 Msamples/s; and 77 mW at
65 Msamples/s (see the figure). Their signal-to-noise ratio
(SNR) is 70 dBFS at a 10-MHz intermediate frequency (IF).
They come in a 9- by 9-mm, 64-pin quad flat nolead
(QFN) package.
According to National Semiconductor, the
ADC12EU050 offers a typical per-channel power
consumption of 40 mW at 40 Msamples/s and 44 mW at
50 Msamples/s. Its SNR is 70 dBFS at a 3.5-MHz IF. The
chip comes in a 68-pin, 10- by 10-mm leadless leadframe
package (LLP).
Special features in the TI chips accommodate the different
needs of the applications they target. A low-frequency
noise-suppression mode eliminates 1/f (flicker) noise,
improving SNR by up to 4.2 dB over a 1-MHz band in
baseband and time-domain applications.
Particularly
in ultrasound applications, where an
implanted bit of metal in a body can provide
a
much stronger echo than bone or soft tissue,
overload-recovery circuitry allows each
of TI’s
ADCs to provide valid data within one
clock cycle after an input overload as high as 6 dB.
At the
other
end of the signal-strength spectrum,
0- to 12-dB programmable gain boosts input signals as
low as 0.5 V p-p to improve dynamic range. TI’s chips also
have a companion eight-channel amplifier, the VCA8500,
expressly for medical-imaging applications.
Some of the National ADC12EU050’s special features
take advantage of the oversampling architecture. Thanks
to its integrated low-pass, brick-wall anti-aliasing filter, no
external anti-aliasing filter is necessary. The continuoustime
architecture also means the IC has an easy-to-drive,
purely resistive input stage that, of course, does not
require a sample-and-hold amplifier.
National has overcome the continuous-time architecture’s
traditional susceptibility to clock jitter with an integrated
phase-locked loop (PLL) and voltage-controlled
oscillator (VCO) for clock conditioning. Like the TI converters,
the National devices provide on-chip instant-overload recovery circuitry that recovers from saturation within one
clock cycle if the input exceeds pre-determined limits.
In both cases, these parts are just beginning to sample.
Datasheets are still only a few pages long. Additionally, most
characteristics are “typical.” (The Texas Instruments datasheet
does include some guaranteed minimums.) Any design team
working on a project that might use one or the other will likely
be in touch with both companies and their application-support
engineers.
WHENCE CONTINUOUS TIME?
Check out “A Continuous-Time S-? Modulator with 88dB
Dynamic Range and 1.1MHz Signal Bandwidth” by Shouli
Yan of the University of Texas and Edgar Sánchez-Sinencio of
Texas A&M. Presented at the 2003 International Solid State
Circuits Conference, it’s available at http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~slyan/data/yan_isscc03.pdf.
In a nutshell, a continuous-time converter moves the sampling
operation from the input to the ADC to just after the forward
loop filter in the delta-sigma modulator. (Analog Devices
claims trademark rights to the term “Sigma-Delta.” Electronic
Design uses the term “delta-sigma” in reference to non-ADI
oversampling ADCs.)
Continue on Page 2
What’s so good about moving the sampling operation
downstream? In a discrete-time delta-sigma ADC, there is,
as in most ADCs, a switched-capacitor filter. Designing one
requires the creation of fast settling circuits and an input buffer
to eliminate sample glitches.
Also, switched-capacitor input filters set their poles and
zeroes through capacitor ratios relative to the sampling clock
frequency. Because capacitor thermal noise is inversely proportional
to capacitance, the capacitors must be relatively
large to obtain the best SNR.
In addition, to acquire an accurate representation of the
input signal on a hold capacitor, the input stages must settle
to a finite level dictated by the accuracy limits of the system.
During acquisition, settling time depends on the systems’
exponential time constant and slew rate.
Why design discrete-time ADCs, then? Discrete-time input
filter characteristics scale with clock frequency. Filter performance,
therefore, always matches the sample clock rate.
(One penalty for this, though, is that the higher the clock frequency,
the more dynamic power is consumed.)
That link with the clock rate has made discrete-time attractive
over the years. In a continuous-time design, the filter characteristic
depends on conventional active-filter design rules. If the sample rate is changed to match input-signal bandwidth,
the continuous-time filter must be retuned.
It becomes a real challenge to ensure that a wide range of
sample rates can be supported from a single product platform.
A further problem lies in achieving high linearity in highresolution
implementations, because the loop filter requires a
great deal of gain.
Continuous-time design was so difficult, it remained essentially
a laboratory curiosity for decades. Yet in 2005, Xignal,
a fabless German company with just 33 employees, said it
could stabilize the clock using a novel inductive tank circuit.
Somewhat counterintuitively, Xignal also found that exploiting
deep-submicron CMOS processes helped make highspeed
delta-sigma modulators a reality. Not only do they help
lower the cost of implementing complex multistage digital
filters, they also support high clock rates, allowing wide inputsignal
bandwidths. The rest of Xignal’s innovation included
a high-speed, multibit third-order modulator and a tunable,
high-gain, continuous-time loop filter stage.
In the long run, Xignal determined that the fabless model
wasn’t going to be the route to riches in the world of ADCs.
National acquired the company in January 2007 and put
on a full-court press, applying its design and manufacturing
prowess to productize Xignal’s innovation. The result was the
ADC12EU050.
See Associated Chart
See Associate Figure
|