[Pease Porridge]
Bob's Mailbox
Bob Pease
ED Online ID #18429
March 27, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
HI BOB:
I would like to ask about designing a sinewave
amplitude attenuator with programmable
attenuation. Preferably, it will just contain
basic components (op amps, transistor, resistors, caps, etc.).
Input: 1-V p-p sine wave (1 kHz frequency), symmetric at 0-V
level. Desired output: still at 1 kHz, but the amplitude varies
from 0 to 1000 mV.
–JOERICH SUNICO
HELLO, JOERICH:
For the last 30+ years, the multiplying digital-to-analog
converter (MDAC) has been a good way to do this. A 10-bit
MDAC will attenuate a 1024-mV p-p sine wave to any amplitude
such as 1023, 1022... 1001, 1000, 999, 998... 637, 636,
635... down to 1 and 0 mV p-p. These days, nobody builds their
own MDACs because the ones you can buy are so good. You
can also get 8- and 12-bit MDACs. Can I recommend a part
number? How about the DAC101S101 (bus-compatible)?
Look it up at National’s Web site at www.national.com.
Now if you have decided to take on a project, to reinvent the
wheel and make your own DAC, to use hundreds of parts to
generate the same function as two chips (the DAC and the op
amp), be my guest. But nobody has been publishing circuits on
how to do this for 30 years, because the item you buy for $2 is
so much better.
You could put a string of 1000 22-O 1% resistors in series.
You could put in 999 switches. You could decode the digital
code. You could do it in binary or in BCD. You could make it
very accurate. You could solder day and night. But that’s just to
show that if you had a time machine, you could go back to 1950
and make your own MDAC. Bulky, slow, expensive. Have fun.
I did design a 10-bit MDAC module around 1972. But it
had to have low phase shift at 1/2 MHz, very fast settling, and
low glitches. And to this day, that is not easy to do on one chip.
It was 2 by 4 by 0.39 in. high, and it was beastly to make. We
finally figured out that the customer had made a mistake when
he wrote up the specs, so we got out of the contract and sent
him something else that made him happier.
–RAP
HI BOB,
I recently purchased some germanium TO-3 power transistors
just for fun to see if I am smart enough to use them. The newer
IGBTs, etc., are wonderful. You can switch lightning voltages
(almost), and they are certainly the way to go. But I have an old
CD ignition system that I have had on three old cars over the
course of 23 years, and I picked it up off a junkyard car when it
was 20 years old. So 43 years of use with germanium power transistors
under the hood says something for a design.
I have noticed the old TO-3 transistors have a very nice
lightweight aluminum low-profile case. It must be good for heat
transfer, corrosion, and weight savings. Why were steel cases
ever used for TO-3 transistors? Steel is heavy, it offers poor heat
transfer, and it rusts. Could cost be that high for aluminum?
–CRAIG RIPPLINGER
HI, CRAIG:
Aluminum TO-3s are cheaper and used when the customer
wants the lowest price. The thermal impedance is about the
same as steel. (Aluminum is only better as a heatsink on a
per-ounce basis.) But the weakness of aluminum TO-3s is for
thermal cycling. Even with the best die attach, after about 5000
full-range (150°C to cold) temp cycles, the die attach gets flaky
and turns into a cold-soldered joint, and the thermal impedance
goes way up. If you’re running a high-power application, as
you might if the temp cycling is extreme, the die can overheat.
In the steel package, the life is 40 times longer, or more. If you
don’t run the die to 150°C, on an LM317, the degradation is
much less. If you only go to 85°C, which most germanium can
stand, the degradation is much lower. In a “transistor ignition,”
the germanium transistor’s die will rarely get above 45°C, so it
will last a very long time. At National, we haven’t made aluminum
TO-3s for more than 20 years.
–RAP
BOB,
Your suggestion in your Feb. 28 column to connect a solid
copper ground plane to the neutral conductor of the power
line is dangerous. Although the neutral conductor is nominally
at earth potential, load currents through the impedance
of this line will raise the neutral conductor and ground
plane above earth potential. This will become worse if the
neutral connection becomes flaky or if there is a fault and
the lines are improperly fused, which is more likely on an
experimenter’s workbench. Instead, the ground plane should
be permanently bonded to green-wire ground. A groundfault
circuit interrupter on the mains should also be used.
–MATTHEW GRAEN
HELLO, MATTHEW:
Thank you for the correction.
–RAP
Comments invited! rap@galaxy.nsc.com —or:
Mail Stop D2597A, National Semiconductor
P.O. Box 58090, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8090
|