[Pease Porridge]
What's All This One-Transistor Op-Amp Stuff, Anyhow?
Bob Pease
ED Online ID #18732
May 8, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
One day, back about 1966, I was going up the
elevator at 285 Columbus Avenue in Boston
to look at some production problems on
Philbrick’s fifth floor. And who was in the
elevator, but George Philbrick’s friend Jim Pastoriza.
Jim was going up to show George his new analog computer
demonstrator—portable and battery-powered. In fact, it was
running, and he gave me a demo right on the elevator as we
ascended. And, this modular analog computer ran on a couple
of Jim’s new one-transistor op amps.
This is not an April Fool’s joke. This is not a hoax (see the
figure). I don’t think anything ever came of that amplifier,
though. Nobody else ever heard of it. It was never published. It
was obviously the result of some kind of a bar bet. George must
have bet a big bar bill on whether such an amplifier could be
built. And Jim was gonna win the bet!
HISTORY ALMOST REPEATS ITSELF
I did see the schematic of that amplifier, and it was very much
like the one shown here. But I never did see the internals of the
amplifier’s construction. Since I just remembered this amplifier
after more than 40 years, I decided to re-create it. I got a group
of likely looking transformers and tried to get them to ring
when tickled. They would not ring with any decent Q when
tuned with 1000 pF.
Finally, a friend had pity on me and loaned me a good, small
(1.1-in.) Carbonyl C toroid. (Carbonyl is pure iron in powder
form, embedded in a neutral matrix.) When wound with 60
turns, it had good Q. I put on a few more turns and lashed it
into the circuit shown. It oscillated nicely at 0.7 MHz, using a
2N3906. (Jim had used a 2N384-type, which is a little hard to
find these days.)
Then I added in the galvanically isolated “front end” with
the V47 varactors, with the 220-pF feedback to the base of the
PNP. I was able to wiggle the dc voltage at the negative input
and modulate the amplitude of oscillation—and to move the
dc output voltage a little. I fooled around with various variable
capacitors, and trimpots, too, and twisted-pair capacitors. I got
the “gain” up to 0.2 and then 0.4.
I borrowed our best “twiddle box” and it helped, as the
capacitor had a knob on it. The 1.9k in series with 68 pF was
rather touchy, but I got the gain up to 12. Then I added a little
PFB with the 24k/5k divider. (I could get high gain in a small
region, but it was not very linear, and even then, it had good
high gain mostly when VOS was as gross as 0.5 V.) Finally, I got
the gain error down to ±0.1 V for a ±1-V output swing.
Jim had said his gain was up at 1000. I was hoping I could
get the gain up to 100, but none of my tricks could get it up there. Jim was a good engineer, and he knew a lot about varactor
amplifiers, but maybe he never really got it to 1000. But it
works okay even with a gain of 20.
THE RESULTS
Anyhow, I set up the big one-transistor kluge along with
another low-power FET op amp as “A2” and ran them as an
analog computer as Jim had showed me on the elevator. If you
look at the output of A2, it starts out pegged. If you turn the
VIN pot, you can bring the meter to a balanced state, but it’s
moving fast. Can you manipulate that pot to get and keep the
meter on-scale? After you understand that this is simply a double
integrator, and after you practice a bit, it’s not very hard.
So, here is a little analog computer that you can use to practice
closing the loop around a double integrator. And now you
see that a one-transistor amplifier is not a hoax! Improbable,
yes, but usable in a pinch. I haven’t given up on getting good
gain, but I’ll spend no more time on it for now.
One of my friends reminded me that there’s one thing worse
than a circuit with too many transistors, and that’s a circuit
with too few transistors. Yeah, that’s true. But back in 1966,
using a small number of those expensive transistors wasn’t a
terrible idea. If I could only get the gain a little higher!
Comments invited! rap@galaxy.nsc.com —or:
Mail Stop D2597A
National Semiconductor
P.O. Box 58090
Santa Clara, CA
95052-8090
|