[EEPN In Electronic Design]
Measuring Large Flows With Small Sensors Improves Accuracy
Donna Sandfox
ED Online ID #18894
May 22, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
Flow sensors are critical components in a variety
of medical applications, from monitoring the
output of gas delivery systems to ensure accurate
flow rates to monitoring a patient’s breathing.
Ventilators, anesthesia delivery, oxygen concentrators,
spirometers, insufflators, sleep apnea diagnostic and treatment
equipment, pulmonary-function test equipment, and other
critical devices all require flow measurement.
Some of the flow-sensing technology available includes
differential pressure, positive displacement, and turbine
approaches. Today, physicians are requiring electronic measurement
to monitor gas flow, which provides greater accuracy
and reliability. It also allows for the capture of an accurate log
of treatment progress.
MEMS ON THE JOB
Compared to other flow-measurement components that don’t
integrate signal amplification and temperature compensation,
microelectrical-mechanical system (MEMS) mass flow
sensors offer easier integration and cost savings. Individually
precalibrated at the factory, these MEMS sensors reduce
installation time by eliminating the sorting process (Fig. 1).
Also, final product calibration often isn’t necessary.
Employing MEMS flow sensors, users can expect highly
accurate and stable mass flow measurements. They offer many
advantages over other technologies, though MEMS mass flow
sensors often come with a higher price tag because of higher
flow-rate requirements.
One solution for reducing cost, space requirements, and
weight is to configure a low-flow-rate mass flow sensor in
a bypass configuration to measure the higher flow rates. A
MEMS flow-sensor bypass setup is similar to that of a differential
pressure sensor, which is also an indirect method of
measuring gas flow (Fig. 2).
The MEMS sensors also deliver a higher resolution at very
low flow rates when compared to differential pressure (dP)
sensors. Figure 3 illustrates the difference between typical mass
flow sensors and dP sensors. At flow rates close to zero, the dP
curve flattens out, making it difficult to distinguish low flow
readings from no flow or negative flow.
A basic bypass setup consists of two ports inserted into
the main flow path with an orifice or some other type of flow restrictor between them. The restriction in the main flow path
causes the flow to follow the path of least resistance into the bypass
channel and through the flow sensor. As a result, the pressure drop
over the sensor needs to be greater than or equal to that between
the bypass ports (Fig. 4).
BEFORE YOU START
Items for consideration when designing a bypass setup include the
flow rate, distance from the main flow path to the sensor, diameters
of the main flow path and the bypass tube, and the amount of
restriction and shape of the flow restrictor (Fig. 5). The design of
the flow restrictor not only affects the pressure drop created, it also
can assist in straightening the flow or making it more laminar.
Turbulence in the gas flow, another considration, can result in
unstable readings. However, the use of modeling with computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) software can assist in resolving this
process to optimize the design. Some MEMS sensor manufacturers
can provide this service.
|