[Technology Report]
IPTV Makes Channel Surfing More Like Web Surfing
Internet Protocol TV looks to put a sizable dent into cable TV's domination over the television-delivery marketplace.
Louis E. Frenzel
ED Online ID #19833
October 9, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
How do you watch television? Nearly 70% of us get our TV via
one of the major cable providers. Satellite has carved out a good
niche and grabs more than 20% of that market. If it’s strictly
over the air, then hold your hand up as one of the 15% who still
claim that as their means of reception. (That will change, as
analog TV transmission expires on February 17, 2009.)
Now the dawn of Internet Protocol TV (IPTV) is changing
the landscape even further. AT&T, Verizon, and other
telecommunications (phone) companies (telcos) are making a
huge effort to bring TV to the Internet and over fiber. There
are some tremendous benefits to IPTV. However, some interesting
technical and business challenges must be dealt with,
not to mention the fact that cable is fighting back.
“What if any new benefits does IPTV bring over cable?”
asks Peter Percosan, Texas Instruments’ director of broadband
strategy. The IPTV services are essentially at parity with the
cable companies even though their content offerings are still
a bit below what the premier cable companies offer. The main
difference is the pricing advantage that IPTV has over cable.
It remains to be seen how long that lasts, though, even as
content grows. The telcos need some clear, distinguishing
factor to help them gain a stronger foothold in the pay-TV
business. According to Mike Coward, CTO of Continuous
Computing, two benefits could make the difference.
First, in IPTV, each subscriber gets a different video/audio
stream that’s specifically just what that subscriber has selected
with the remote control. All of the content is sent via fiber to
the neighborhood DSLAMs (digital subscriber line access
multiplexers). At this point, the customer’s selected channel is
picked out and sent to the set-top box (STB). Cable customers
always get all of the content selected by the STB consumer.
Thus, telcos have the opportunity to do targeted marketing
and advertising, which isn’t possible with cable.
Second, IPTV subscribers can select time-shifted TV
watching. This is done now with a TiVo box or digital video
recorder (DVR) at the subscriber’s home. Telcos can offer what
might be called network personal video recorders (PVRs),
where the stored video is on the carrier’s servers (for an extra
charge). These options may be the
differentiator the telcos need to
succeed with TV.
IPTV EXPLAINED
The term IPTV should explain
itself, but the definitions are tricky.
IP means the Internet Protocol, of
course, so it implies the transmission
of video and audio using the
IP. However, that’s not the same
as Internet TV, which is what we
call those YouTube videos and clips
using Microsoft wave files. And it’s
not the video supplied by Google,
Yahoo, MySpace, or Microsoft that
viewers watch on their PCs.
Figure 1 shows the basic structure
of an IPTV network. The telecom
network is fiber to the neighborhood
and a fast DSL line to the
customer’s home for Internet access
on the PC or IPTV. This diagram
shows that IPTV also could
be delivered over a cable network
and could very well occur in the future. A hybrid STB that
can accommodate IPTV,
cable, or even digital broadcast
over-the-air TV may be a
necessity in some areas.
There are two good examples of IPTV
in the U.S. AT&T’s U-verse system,
which began in Texas, is now rolling out
across the country in selected areas. Fiber
is run to the neighborhoods and terminates at a DSLAM that
gives access to AT&T’s phone customers via the installed copper
unshielded twisted pair (UTP) base. Using fast ADSL2 or
VDSL2, the TV then is delivered to the customer’s TV set in
compressed format.
Because it’s a fast broadband Internet connection, the customer
can also get DSL Internet access service up to 6 Mbits. (Voice
over IP, or VoIP, is optional.) These bundled “triple-play” services
are a bargain compared to what you pay for the individual services
and in most cases less expensive than equivalent deals from
the cable companies.
The other example is Verizon’s FiOS. This full-blown fiber-tothe-
home (FTTH) service offers TV, high-speed Internet service,
and VoIP. Downstream speed is 50 Mbits/s and upstream is 20
Mbits/s, the fastest available to date. FiOS isn’t true IPTV, since it
uses a delivery method similar to cable TV’s modulated RF system
for TV, data, and other services. But rumors abound that Verizon
will change to an all-IPTV system in the future.
While fiber is expensive, it’s the ultimate answer to higherbandwidth
broadband services. DSL providers of Internet service
have already hit the wall, so to speak, with data rates usually maxing
out at 6 Mbits/s (slightly more in a few places). High-end
DSL versions like VDSL2 do provide very high rates, but only
over short distances.
Some carriers have tried using VSLS2
on two UTPs in the cable reaching 50
Mbits/s over longer distances. Top cable
rates for ordinary service are faster, but
cable companies have nearly hit the limit
at about 20 Mbits/s with current systems
and prices are high.
Thanks to the new cable protocol DOCSIS
3.0 (Data Over Cable Service Interface
Specification), cable can now offer rates to
about 50 Mbits/s with a technique called
channel bonding. Fiber is the only way up
beyond this point. So while it is expensive,
you will begin to see more and more
fiber in the future. TV demands it and consumers
are pressing for faster downloads,
uploads, and gaming capability. IPTV can
provide that, but cable is clearly keeping up
Continue on Page 2
IPTV HARDWARE
A rear-view image of a typical IPTV STB
provides the details on inputs and outputs
(Fig. 2). The Amino STB
comes in a variety of configurations
depending on
the service provider and geographical
location.
This unit takes the IPTV signal in
via a standard 10/100 Ethernet port
attached to the broadband modem.
Outputs to the TV set or other devices
include HDMI, S/P DIF (Sony/Philips Digital Interface
digital audio), and optical S/P DIF. Some units also provide for
composite, component, RGB, S-video, and other video formats. A
USB 2.0 port is included as well.
The video decoders are MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 with resolutions
to 720p and 1080i. The box will also decode MPEG-2 with resolutions
to 720p and 1080i. Additionally, it handles protocols like
Video on Demand (VoD) Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)
video session control and multicast with Internet Group Management
Protocol (IGMP). It can be configured for 4:3 and 16:9 aspect
ratios. Both PAL 50-Hz and NTSC 60-Hz outputs are available.
The digital output with HDMI uses the HDCP protocol. Stereo
and Dolby 5.1 surroundsound are supported. Other features include
an IR remote control and HTML 4 browser with JavaScript.
Circuitry inside the typical IPTV STB is very simple and often
contained in a single large IC. The input usually goes through an
RJ-45 connector to an Ethernet port from the external cable TV
or DSL broadband modem. This signal is then sent to the media
processor chip that does all of the decryption, video decompression,
and other protocol implementation.
An example of such a chip is Sigma Design’s SMP8654 (Fig. 3).
This device is a higher-performance version of the SMP8634, which
happens to be used in more IPTV STBs than any other device.
From a media-processing standpoint, the SMP8654 offers
a full complement of advanced decoder
engines with high-definition video decoding,
including H.264 (MPEG-4 part 10),
Windows Media Video 9, VC-1, MPEG-2
and MPEG-4 (part 2), and the new AVS
standard. High-performance graphics
acceleration, multistandard audio decoding,
advanced display-processing capabilities,
and HDMI 1.3 output round out its
multimedia core.
Powerful content security is ensured
through a dedicated secure processor, onchip
flash memory, and a range of digital
rights management (DRM) engines
for high-speed payload decryption. The
SMP8654 also features a full complement
of system peripherals, including a dual
Gigabit Ethernet controller, dual USB 2.0
controller, NAND flash controller, and IR
and SATA controllers.
In effect a multicore media processor,
the SMP8654 features a 500-MHz
MIPS 24k main CPU that enables crisp user interaction as well as a wider range of
application-based features that enhance
the “future-proofing” of this platform.
A second MIPS processor known as the
IPU manages interrupt operations and
offloads burdensome system tasks, such as
portions of the network stack, to further
optimize main CPU utilization. A third
MIPS processor manages all system security
functions, including decryption and
key generation.
The SMP8654 also features a new
DDR-2 memory controller. It supports
double-data-rate (DDR) memories up to
666 Mbits/s as well as an improved arbitration
engine to maximize the efficiency
of accesses. Finally, the processor maintains
software compatibility with the Sigma
Multimedia Library to uniquely build on
the proven performance and reliability of
the earlier generation platforms.
Sigma also recently announced a collaboration
that will enable the Microsoft
Mediaroom Internet Protocol Television
and multimedia platform to operate
on next-generation STBs using the Sigma
SMP8654 SoC. Thanks to the solution’s
high-performance, cost-effective design,
service providers will likely be able to offer
innovative connected TV services, such as
PC to TV photo and music sharing as well
as DVR Anywhere, which gives consumers
the flexibility to watch their recorded
programs on any TV in their home. Some
STBs, especially in Europe, have built-in
tuners so they can get over-the-air digital
TV broadcasts, too.
On the carrier side, a complete IPTV
platform requires switches, packet processing
blades, CPU cards, and high-availability
software that can handle 10G Ethernet
speeds. One such example is Continuous
Computing’s 10 Gigabit Traffic Management
and Security Platform (Fig. 4).
At the heart of this platform, which is
based on the Advanced Telecommunications
Architecture (ATCA), is the FlexPacket
PP50, a high-performance packet-processing
blade. It uses two Raza Microelectronics
XLR732 packet processors for packet
inspection and classification.
For the computing part of the system,
Continuous Computing offers its Flex-
Compute ATCA-XE50 quad-core Intel
Xeon processing board. The switching can
be handled by one of Continuous Computing’s
switches like the FlexCore ATCAFM40,
an integrated 10G Ethernet base
fabric switching and management solution.
CABLE'S DOCSIS RESPONSE
Cable continues its dominance by moving
toward DOCSIS 3.0. This CableLabs
standard has yet to be widely adopted, but
it will gradually find its way into every
cable head end and STB. It provides more
flexible and scalable high-speed Internet
service at least four times faster than current
DOCSIS 2.0 systems.
In addition, DOCSIS 3.0 simplifies and
accelerates the introduction of new HD
multimedia services, such as voice over cable
and IPTV. Then with its ability to bond
multiple channels together, it can achieve
very high downstream and upstream rates.
For example, with each 6-MHz channel
capable of about 40 Mbits/s max, with four
bonded channels, a rate of 160 Mbits/s can
be achieved. DOCSIS also supports IPv6.
Continue on Page 3
Texas Instruments’ answer to the DOCSIS
opportunity is its Puma 5 product line.
Its latest addition, the TNETC4820 chip,
not only implements full DOCSIS 3.0 but
also supports an optional hybrid approach that includes full IPTV implementation.
The TNETC4820 has high-speed interfaces,
such as Gigabit Ethernet and USB
2.0, as well.
It’s set up so wireless networking, powerline
technologies, and advanced coax
network solutions can be easily integrated.
The chip also supports bonding up to eight
downstream channels and four upstream
channels for greater speed and capacity.
The TNETC4820 is sampling now and is
fully CableLabs certified for DOCSIS 3.0.
It’s also interesting to note that while the
future is still fiber, DSL continues to dominate
the IPTV space, mostly in Europe
and Asia. Thanks to advanced standards
like ADSL2 and VDSL2, this telco technology
still has life in it.
ZYXEL, WHICH SUPPLIES DSL CHIPS
for customer premise equipment (CPE),
reports recent increases. Conexant’s DSL
chips have been adopted by China’s ZTE
into DSLAMs that will supply ADSL2+
into millions of Chinese homes. The
Dell’Oro Group reports DSL port increases
in the second quarter of 2008. For the
time being, DSL will remain the core
last-mile technology in IPTV until passive
optical networks (PONs) eventually
drop significantly in cost and customers
demand speeds beyond VDSL2.
Let’s not forget that for each of the millions
of new STBs, millions of new Ethernet
ports will be required. SMSC offers
an extensive line of Ethernet ports and
switches designed for IPTV, HDTV, and
other STB uses.
What the Market is saying
With IPTV being relatively new, the
number of subscribers is not in the same
category of cable TV subscribers, but it’s
growing at amazing rates. Worldwide
IPTV subscribers are estimated to number
more than 10 million, mostly in Europe
and Asia. North America is a much smaller
percentage, estimated to be about 17% of
the total. There were about 1.8 million
IPTV subscribers at the end of 2007, and
they are AT&T and Verizon customers.
Nonetheless, North American growth
is exploding. Market research firm iSuppli
expects total telco TV subscribers to rise to
nearly 20 million by the end of this year.
Furthermore, iSuppli indicates that IPTV
subscribers in both North and South
America totalled 1.8 million at the end of
2007, up from 501,000 in 2006 (Fig. 5).
As of April 2008, Verizon has about 1.2
million FiOS subscribers, while AT&T’s
U-verse subscribers number about 400,000.
The growth rate is significant, with expectation
that there will be well over 3 million
subscribers in both by year’s end.
Strategy Analytics indicates that U.S.
IPTV revenues will grow to $14 billion
in 2012, up from $694 million in 2007.
Futuresource Consulting projects that
global shipments of pay-TV STBs should
grow by nearly 40% by 2012. That represents
an increase of 38 million units. The
Synergy Research Group indicates that the
worldwide number of IPTV subscribers
could approach 40 million by 2010.
Interestingly, according to iSuppli, growth
in IPTV hasn’t come at the expense of satellite
TV subscribers. Most early projections
for IPTV seemed to say that growth would
come by stealing satellite subscribers. Yet
DirecTV and EchoStar added 2.1 million
subscribers, boosting the total from 36.3
million to 39.5 million from 2006 to 2007
in North and South America combined.
That clearly indicates the overall market is
growing for TV service spurred on by the
increasing demand for HDTV.
Steve Rago, iSuppli’s broadband analyst,
believes that as telco TV continues its
aggressive push, some of its growth will
come from the satellite providers as well as
a good segment of the cable TV market.
The telcos are determined to make this
work. Cable TV remains the 800-pound
gorilla in this market, and all expectations
are that it will remain so in the U.S. Still,
IPTV will continue to grow and ultimately
have some effect on the cable market, due
to its current pricing advantage.
.
|