[Engineering Essentials]
Synthetic Instrumentation No Longer A Test Case
Designers can now get their hands on the next evolution of test and measurement equipment, which delivers flexibility, speed, and cost benefits.
Louis E. Frenzel
ED Online ID #19950
November 7, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
Synthetic instrumentation (SI) offers a different approach
to test and measurement. It uses a collection of basic hardware
and software building blocks in a flexible, open, and
modular architecture to synthesize the stimulus and measurement
functions required by a given test application. So, why do
we need it?
As electronic products become increasingly integrated and
dependent on software, testing procedures get more complex
and time-consuming. Instruments have kept pace with these
testing needs, but costs have soared since test systems are built
for singular, special needs.
Automatic test systems (ATSs) speed up and simplify testing,
as well as automate the process and squeeze out some
test costs, especially in high-volume devices like cell phones.
To some extent, modular test systems using the PXI bus have
helped along these lines. However, many test systems capable
of producing the desired cost and throughput goals become
dead-end investments that can’t be used for other current
products or even next-generation products.
This problem of investing in new test systems for just one
product has become particularly acute in the military and
aerospace sector—so much so that the government issued
guidelines to create a more modular, generic, and flexible test
approach that can be quickly reconfigured for different products
and systems. Say hello to synthetic instrumentation.
While the early systems adopted by the aerospace and military
proved successful, the techniques have yet to significantly
impact the consumer and commercial sectors. Nonetheless, SI
shows lots of promise. Its usage continues to grow, costs are on
the decline, and more companies are beginning to build test
products. As a result, it’s likely that SI will eventually impact
your own world.
CLARIFYING THE DEFINITIONS
You know what traditional instruments are—multimeters,
oscilloscopes, signal generators, and vector signal analyzers.
These benchtop units are devoted to a specific purpose, such
as measuring voltage or power, observing voltage waveforms
versus time, generating test signals, looking at power versus
frequency, or performing a complex modulation analysis.
In many cases, these same instruments or modified versions
thereof also become part of production test systems. Rackand-
stack traditional instruments do their jobs well, but they
must be organized, sequenced, and programmed to carry out
their task. GPIB, LXI, and other interconnections ensure communications
between instruments, and specialized software
organizes the measurement process and data collection.
Once the test system is successfully built, its performance
is superior. But on the downside, as mentioned, the system
typically targets just one job. Also, it often contains redundant
elements (multiple displays, keyboards, digitizers, frequency
converters, etc.), which results in an expensive, larger, and heavier system. Changing the applications
requires new interconnections and programming
to use the same equipment in a
new test system.
The instruments’ high cost and the time
involved in reconfiguring and preprogramming
is significant. A system made
to test radar sets for the Air Force can’t
be used to test missile hardware for the
Navy, though many of the same tests may
need to be run. As the largest customer of
T&M equipment in the world, the Department
of Defense (DoD) wants to change
that to save money and extend the life of
test systems.
FROM NI’S VI TO SI
In the mid-1980s, a new approach called
virtual instrumentation (VI) came along.
Virtual instruments are built-in software
executed on a PC or laptop. National
Instruments (NI), the inventor of VI,
defines it as a software-defined system in
which software based on user requirements
defines the functionality of generic measurement
hardware.
The instrument is built around modular
I/O and data-conversion hardware using
PXI modules, while software does all of
the processing and measuring. Even the
front panel of the specialized instrument
with its display and controls is softwaredefined.
Software programs the system.
NI also created the software known as
LabVIEW. It makes programming a snap
by using a graphical user interface with
icons and interconnections in a dataflow
format. Because the software actually carries
out the measurement, the instrument
is easily customized and rapidly changed.
Continue on Page 2
VI has revolutionized the test and measurement
business. Still, not all applications
are a good fit, which is why traditional
bench instruments continue to be very
popular in design and development.
When the software approach is used
in traditional instruments, though, they
become more flexible for a wider range of
tests. For instance, many traditional instruments
work well in a maintenance and
service environment, but tend to be too
expensive for some specialized instrumentation
applications.
For data acquisition, VI is ideal due to
its modularity and flexibility. What’s needed
is a version of VI that’s more generic,
modular, and reconfigurable that can be
reprogrammed and used in a wider range of
applications, from production test to service
and repair. This is where SI steps in.
The Department of Defense conceived
the SI concept in the mid-1990s to reduce
test instrument costs, extend the life of
test systems, and make them more flexible
and useful. The department defined its
Next Generation Automatic Test System
(NxTest) in its report to Congress in 2002.
It set these goals for ATS to be used in
the military:
• Reduce total cost of ownership.
• Reduce the logistics involved in supporting
test systems with fewer spares and
training.
• Reduce the time needed to develop and
deploy new test systems.
• Increase flexibility by creating systems
that are useful in multiple applications
and are interoperable with one another.
• Improve the quality of the testing process.
The Synthetic Instruments Working
Group (SIWG), an organization that comprises
representatives of the DoD, equipment
vendors, and contractors, was formed
in 2004. It defined a solution and set of
standards that could meet these goals.
Also, it defined SI as a reconfigurable system
that interconnects a group of elemental
hardware and software components via
standard interfaces to generate signals or
make measurements using numeric processing
techniques.
The focus is on modular and flexible
components that can be quickly added,
removed, updated, and reconnected to
quickly and easily make changes and
updates. Initially, the SI emphasis is on
RF/microwave equipment, because that’s
the largest part of the military’s arsenal
of electronic gear. It includes radio communications,
radar, satellites, electronic
warfare systems, missile guidance, and
remote reconnaissance.
The basic SI architecture has a signal
input path and signal output path (Fig.
1). Input signals to be measured undergo
some signal conditioning and scaling, usually
to a downconverter that translates the
signal to a lower intermediate frequency
(IF) before it reaches the analog-to-digital
converter (ADC).
The digitized signal is then stored in
memory. The numeric processor employs
that data file using various digital-signalprocessing
techniques to make the desired
measurement. The processor may be a PC,
FPGA, or DSP. The software defines the
measurement that would emulate an oscilloscope,
spectrum analyzer, vector signal
analyzer, or other instrument. The front
panel is often omitted.
The other signal path handles signal
generation for device-under-test (DUT)
stimulus. Data to be transmitted in baseband
form is processed as required and
then sent to an arbitrary waveform generator
(AWG), where the final signal is created.
This signal at some IF is then upconverted
to the final RF output. Note that
all of the different modules have control
lines that allow them to be switched in
or out, reconfigured, and rerouted to fit
the application.
With this flexible architecture, almost
any test, measurement, or signal-generation
need can be met. The hardware
modules’ design allows for easy replacement
with newer, more capable units as
the technologies improve. Since no front panels or control panels are needed,
the entire test system is smaller and
lighter, uses less power, and is far
more mobile, which is a necessity
in military applications like repair
depots, flight lines, and battlefields.
The hardware part of SI is probably
the simpler part of making a
system. The massive software development
effort, on the other hand, can be difficult
and expensive. That’s why the progress of
SI has been rather slow.
While the military and government
aerospace companies can afford the effort,
that software burden doesn’t fit the budgets
of most commercial equipment vendors or
their customers. Eventually that burden
will lessen, and you’ll likely see SI emerge
as a desirable and viable ATS option. Cell
phones are a potential target.
Continue on Page 3
REAL SYNTHETIC TEST PRODUCTS
Not all test and measurement companies
are involved with SI, but some of the
major players do have products. Aeroflex,
Agilent, National Instruments, and Phase
Matrix offer a wide range of different configurations
and interfaces that still comply
with the NxTest initiative standards.
Aeroflex is one of the largest and most
heavily invested firms delivering SI. Late
last year, it announced its fifth-generation
system, known as the Synthetic Multifunction
Adaptable Reconfigurable Test Environment,
or SMART^E (Fig. 2). This is a
version of Aeroflex’s original proprietary
chassis, which has evolved to commercial
off-the-shelf (COTS) LXI modules.
SMART^E now supports multiple vendors
and multiple industry-standard platforms,
including LXI, PXI, Compact PCI,
and GPIB. A wide range of up/downconverters,
digitizers, digital-to-analog converters
(DACs), and accessory modules
(local oscillator, amplifiers, etc.) is available.
The SMART^E system is a complete,
highly integrated solution, unlike
conventional bench instruments simply
packaged into a system that requires vendor
support and integration.
The SMART^E 5000 system provides
a modular approach for implementing
multifunction configurable test systems. It
includes all hardware and software needed
for calibration, test, execution, test reporting,
and test analysis. The system focuses
on RF and microwave testing, which
includes electronic warfare (EW), radar,
satellite, communications, navigation and
identification, military automatic test
equipment (ATE), and general-purpose
microwave test.
Though the system comes standard
with one stimulus channel and one measurement
channel, parallel channels may
be added to each. The stimulus subsystem
can operate to 8, 12, 20, 26.5, or 40 GHz
in a CW, pulsed, or AWG mode. Modulation
options are provided, and this system
includes a noise generator. Power amplifiers
are available.
The measurement subsystem can be
configured to operate to 8, 26.5, or 40 GHz
with an RF bandwidth of up to 400 MHz.
A signal calibration and routing subsystem
contains a local calibration unit for
calibrating RF/microwave signals to NIST
traceable standards, an RF switch matrix
for multiplexing I/O signals to multi-
I/O port units under test (UUTs), and
an S-parameter test set for microwave vector
measurements.
As for software, the SMART^E system
is based on Microsoft Windows,
C/C++/C#, and National Instruments’
TestStand. There’s also an extensive general
measurement test library with built-in
test personality customization via user-settable
parameters and a Transmit/Receive
module test library.
Agilent Technologies offers a series
of modules that support the DoD’s ATS
NxTest vision by delivering a flexible,
modular, and highly morphable system.
These modules are based on the increasingly
popular LAN eXtension for Instruments
(LXI) interface standard. LXI,
which is based on Ethernet connectivity,
allows users to monitor
and control instruments via the
browser on a PC.
On the measurement side, the
N8201A downconverter boasts a
range of 3 Hz to 26.5 GHz that can
be extended to 110 GHz with external
mixing. It also offers three IF outputs
at 7.5, 21.4, and 321.4 MHz. The N8221A
is an IF digitizer with a 30-Msample/s rate
that’s used with the 7.5-MHz IF output.
It has an 80-dB dynamic range, 14 bits of
vertical resolution, and 10-MHz modulation
bandwidth.
Agilent’s Acqiris high-speed digitizers
feature sampling rates of 500 Msamples/s
and 1, 2, 4, and 8 Gsamples/s. Resolutions
of 8, 10, and 12 bits are available, and they
provide large acquisition memories.
As for stimulus modules, the N8211A
analog upconverter upconverts a baseband
signal to final RF and has a frequency
range from 250 kHz to 20 or 40 GHz (Fig.
3). It also includes AM, FM, and pulse
modulation or external modulation input.
The N8212A is a 20-GHz vector
microwave source that generates a stimulus
signal by upconverting from baseband.
It additionally offers AM, FM, and pulse
modulation, 2-GHz I/Q vector modulation,
and external modulation inputs. Two
AWGs are supplied as well.
The N8242A is an AWG that provides
10 bits of resolution and comes with a
sampling rate of either 625 Msamples/s or
1.25 Gsamples/s. Bandwidth can be 500 or
250 MHz. The unit is dual-channel with
single and differential outputs.
Continue on Page 4
The N8241A is another AWG with
15-bit resolution. Its sampling rates and
bandwidth options are the same as the
N8242A. All of these units use the LXI
interconnect system and are typically
mounted in a compact enclosure like
the N8200 (Fig. 3, again). For software,
Agilent offers the Vector Signal Analysis
package and Signal Studio suite.
Of course, National Instruments is a
natural to offer synthetic instrumentation,
since its basic products are close to the
standard definition of SI. NI’s PXIe-1075
chassis, which consists of modules for
each of the major blocks in an SI system tem, has 18 slots for both PXI and PXIe
modules. Figure 4 shows the PXIe-5663
6.6-GHz vector signal analyzer (VSA) and
the PXIe-5673 6.6-GHz vector signal
generator (VSG).
The 5663 VSA is an instrument unto
itself, consisting of three NI PXIe modules—
the 5601 RF downconverter; the
PXI-5652 CW voltage-controlled oscillator
(VCO), which is used as a local oscillator;
and the PXIe-5622 digitizer, a 16-bit
150-Msample/s ADC. These modules can
be used individually for SI configurations.
The PXIe-5673 VSG is also an instrument,
but it comprises three separate modules—
the PXIe-5450 dual-channel AWG
with DAC outputs, the PXI-5652 CW
local oscillator, and the PXIe-5611 RF
upconverter. Again, the individual modules
may be configured into the desired SI
format. These modules can be connected
to form a basic SI (Fig. 5). The local oscillators
aren’t shown.
NI’s RF test systems are designed to
work with the company’s well-known
LabVIEW software. Using this softwaredefined
architecture provides great measurement
flexibility. Users can develop
their own wireless protocols or utilize standard
specific LabVIEW toolkits that generate
and measure most wireless standard
signals. The latest version of LabVIEW
8.6 implements parallel measurement
algorithms on multicore CPUs. This
can mean significantly faster measurements
than those made on more traditional
instruments.
Phase Matrix makes a line of VXI bus
and PXI bus modules suitable for use in SI
systems. These include signal generators,
downconverters, and local oscillators. The
company’s newest products targeting SI
revolve around a family of RF/microwave
downconverter modules for the PXIe bus.
These modules can be configured into any
one of six primary modes operating over
the frequency ranges of 100 kHz to 2.9
GHz, 2.7 to 26.5 GHz, and 100 kHz to
26.4 GHz.
The modules include the RF input conditioner
module, the microwave band input
module, the low band input module, the
local-oscillator module, and the IF output
conditioner module. They’re designed to
support small, portable, and transportable
synthetic instruments that can be programmed
to perform signal analysis or to
emulate older, obsolete instruments.
Also, the modules use programmable
input signal conditioning in the form
of pre-selection filtering in the 2.7- to
26.5-GHz range with bandwidths of
40 MHz minimum to 120 MHz maximum.
The input attenuator can be programmed
from 0 to 70 dB in 10-dB steps.
Local-oscillator switching speed is less
than 1 ms.
These downconverters operate in both
a narrow-band IF of 21.4 MHz and a
wide-band IF of 250 MHz. The units
are designed to work with National
Instruments’ digitizers and other
PXIe modules.
Phase Matrix has joined with BAE Systems
and National Instruments to produce
a next-generation 26.5-GHz synthetic
instrument based on the PXI platform for
military and aerospace applications. BAE
Systems is a defense and aerospace company
offering products and services for air,
land, and naval forces.
REFERENCES
Lupinetti, Francesco, “New Synthetic
Instrumentation Methods Solve Tough
System-Level Test Problems,” Electronic
Design, January 31, 2008.
Nadovich, C.T., Synthetic Instruments:
Concepts and Applications, Newnes/Elsevier,
2005.
|