[Lab Bench]
2008 Was A Year Of Plenty For Processing And Storage
William Wong
ED Online ID #20210
December 11, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
The economy may not be growing,
but processing power and
storage continue to climb. For
example, the lab got a little
crowded with the arrival of Intel’s software
development platform (see the figure). Inside
this massive rack-mount system are four of
Intel’s latest hex-core Xeon “Dunnington”
processors. That’s 24 high-performance cores
in one box. Its care and feeding includes a
RAID array of eight 2.5-in. SAS drives.
To the server crowd, this is going to be the
norm soon, as it highlights the move to massive
core and disk counts. Also, it makes an
ideal platform for running applications based on Intel’s Thread
Building Block technology (see “Threads Make The Move To
Open Source” at www.electronicdesign.com, ED Online 16538).
THE POWER OF THE HARD DRIVE
The move to 2.5-in. drives has had a significant impact on
the design flexibility of servers, allowing RAID-5 systems on
1U platforms. Supermicro’s SC216-R900 packs 24 SAS/SATA
2.5-in. drives into a 2U chassis. The chassis is mostly airspace,
though. The limiting factor is access to the drives since hotswapping
is a requirement.
The rise in capacity is impacting even small platforms like
D-Link’s DNS-321 Network Storage Enclosure. I only had to
pop up the front panel and slide in a pair of 3.5-in., 1.5-Tbyte
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 SATA-II drives. That’s 3 Tbytes in
something smaller than a breadbox.
These devices make a great home for small-business file
servers, but they can also be media servers. The DNS-321
shows up as a Digital Living Network Association (DLNA)
media server suitable for streaming audio and video files.
These storage platforms are likely to get
smaller now that Fujitsu’s MJA2 SATA II
hard drive is online. It packs 500 Gbytes
into a single 2.5-in. drive. While these
smaller drives are destined for laptops, they
also give Buffalo Technology’s LinkStation
Mini its 1-TByte capacity.
A NEW WAY TO SURF CHANNELS
There are several differences between the
DNS-321 and the LinkStation Mini, but
the biggest is that the latter is fanless. This
may seem minor, but it will have an impact
in home theater technology, where silence is
golden—at least when it comes to the equipment.
This leads to another observation about the need to split
content distribution, storage, and delivery. Outfits like Vudu
and Apple have Internet Protocol TV (IPTV) boxes that
deliver HD movie content via the Internet, but they are self
contained. Being a single box does make them easier to set up,
and it provides better control from a distribution perspective.
The catch is that the internal drives store a couple hundred
Gbytes. That’s a far cry from the capacity of the two NAS
boxes from D-Link and Buffalo Technology. These IPTV
boxes are already networked, so connecting them to a NAS box
is a trivial software exercise.
Vudu has something in the works along these lines, but the
ultimate will be when the split occurs so these boxes do not
have any storage inside them. The same holds for digital video
recorders (DVRs). Most new DVRs provide USB or eSATA
hard-drive expansion options, but networking is the way to go.
We already have a lot of analog TVs that are going to turn into
heavy-duty paperweights. It would be nice if DVRs and IPTV
boxes didn’t follow in their footsteps.
|