[Pease Porridge]
Bob's Mailbox
Bob Pease
ED Online ID #20633
February 26, 2009
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
HI BOB,
We know that the noise power generated
in a resistor is proportional to temperature.
If we have a resistor with a zero thermal
coefficient so that the resistance is constant
with the temperature, does the temperature
of the resistor increase due to the thermal
noise? (No, not even sub-infinitesimally! /
rap) In other words, does the resistor noise
create noise voltage or current in the resistor,
which in turn heats the resistor to a
higher temperature, which in turn increases
the noise, which in turn heats the resistor
to a higher temperature, etc.?
(If you have a 1-M resistor with a BW
of 1 MHz, V = 125 µV, and I = 125 pA, its
self-heating would be about 15 fW. In a
250-mW resistor, with nominal heatsinking,
this would cause a temperature rise of
60 femto degrees. I don’t think we have to
worry, even if it did do self-heating! If you
have a different R value, the dissipation in
femtowatts will be about the same, even if
the BW does get bigger. /rap)
My guess is that the noise power calculated
by P = 4 × k × T × BW assumes an
infinite heatsink maintained at temperature
T. Without an infinite heatsink, then, there
will be some increase in temperature, albeit
small, depending on the thermal resistance.
With a practical value of thermal
resistance, the temperature would no doubt
only increment by a minute amount. However,
theoretically, if the thermal resistance
between the resistor and the heatsink was
very large, the resistor temperature could
increase until the resistor burns out.
(Fat chance! If the temperature rose
from 25°C to 125°C or 225°C, the resistor
would radiate its watts away—no heatsinking
required. /rap)
I figured I would get your insight before
I calculated the temperature increase by
some limit method or, perish the thought,
simulation. This might generate an interesting
problem in which one would calculate
the thermal resistance at which the
resistor power would dissipate a specific
amount of power
On the other hand, it would seem that if
you sealed the resistor in a vacuum with
a thermal resistance approaching infinity,
the resistor could get pretty hot, perhaps
10 picodegrees of temperature rise! The
heat power would have to go somewhere
or the temperature would reach infinity, so
we should be able to harvest some of the
heat and use it to do work. But, no, this is
not going to cause the world to come to an
end. The positive feedback will not send
it off to a crazy temperature, which leads
me to think there is something wrong with
my theory. (I gotta admit, I can’t tell you
exactly what is wrong with your theory, but
something is! /rap) Have you ever thought
about this?
STEVE STECKLER
HI STEVE,
I have tried as hard as possible to avoid
thinking about it! I’m going to go home
and pour a drink—or two. I’ll let you know
if I learn anything. Rap
DEAR BOB,
What is your opinion about biasing the
phototransistor base input to change the
response of a phototransistor to light? I
am trying to maximize the transistor’s sensitivity
to light (digital on-off), but I also
think it may be possible to use the base
input to increase the speed in which the
phototransistor turns off. I do not think I
can do both easily.
KEVIN STRATTON
HELLO KEVIN,
If you pull down on the base of the
phototransistor, that helps it turn off—for
example, from the base (pin 6) of a 4N28.
But that will make it much less sensitive to
the first little bit of photocurrent. It won’t
be sensitive to small photocurrents—maybe
not at all.
You may be able to feed the phototransistor’s
output to a linear amplifier and then
to a nonlinear amplifier. But I think you are
right that there is no simple way to do both
of the things that you wish for. Maybe you
can buy a higher gain of phototransistor,
but they are often slower—slower to turn
on, and slower to turn off.
Write down exactly what you want each
little bit (increment) of current to do. But
it sounds as if you want a linear amplifier
with high gain, plus the advantages of high
digital gain (fast on/off). It is usually hard to
do both! Best wishes. Rap
HI BOB,
I’m working on a home project and need
a programmable (waveshape) ac source
(50 to 300 V, up to 10 A). Since it is for
home, I need a cost-effective way to obtain
one. Any suggestions?
LANCE AKAGI
HI LANCE,
Audio power amplifiers that can put out
1500 W aren’t cheap. Put two of them pushpull
(bridge output) into a big transformer,
which also isn’t cheap, because you can
find audio amplifiers that would put out 100
V at 30 A (as into 4 O) but not 300 V into 10
A. V × I is not interchangeable, unless you
can find a suitable transformer.
You want 300 V RMS? That’s a BIG
power transformer. Get a dozen 300-W
audio amplifiers. Put each output into a
mid-sized transformer to give 30 V × 10 A
on the secondary. Stack 10 of those transformer
secondaries. Stand back! Rap
comments invited! rap@galaxy.nsc.com
—or:
Mail Stop D2597a, national Semiconductor
P.o. Box 58090, Santa clara, ca 95052-8090
BOB PEASE obtained a BSEE from MIT in
1961 and is Staff Scientist at National Semiconductor
Corp., Santa Clara, Calif.
|