[Leapfrog: First Look]
32-Bit Architecture Changes The Power Game For Micros
William Wong
ED Online ID #20719
March 12, 2009
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
Arm and its partners are looking to give 8- and
16-bit microcontroller vendors fits with its Cortex
M0 architecture. This optimized implementation
of the Cortex M1 is designed to run on FPGAs.
Its small size and lower power will allow it to be coupled with
mixed-signal peripherals.
The Cortex M0 is one-third the size of the popular ARM7TDMI-
S. The base Cortex M0 configuration requires only 12k
gates, which is on the same order as many 8- and 16-bit
microcontroller processor cores. Memory and peripherals
would be the same size regardless of the core’s width, so the
issues in choosing a system will turn more to development
tools and developer efficiency.
The Cortex M0 and M1 use the same instruction set that’s
a subset of the Cortex M3. It contains only 60 instructions
that are culled from the Thumb and Thumb-2 instruction sets
found in other Arm processors (see the figure).
The Thumb-2 complement numbers less than half a dozen
instructions related to hardware and operating-system support
along with the venerable no operation (NOP) instruction.
Most application codes will utilize the Thumb instructions,
including branching and arithmetic instructions.
The instruction and architecture complement is designed
to host C applications, including device drivers and the
operating system. It follows the Cortex Microcontroller Software
Interface Standard (CMSIS). Migrating applications
up or down to or from other Arm platforms is simply a matter
of recompiling.
WAKE UP AND SIP THE POWER
Low-power applications where the microprocessor
spends most of its time asleep often use 8- and 16-bit solutions.
The Cortex M0 handles this very well with its wakeup
interrupt controller support plus its inherent 32-bit capability
to do more work per instruction in most instances. This
allows the on time in a typical on-off cycle to be smaller—
hence, using less power.
The Cortex M0 draws on 80 µW/MHz. Its performance is
0.9 MIPS/MHz. This combination makes it an ideal platform
for wireless sensors running protocols like Bluetooth, ZWave,
and ZigBee. It also enables designers to bring the computational
performance to sensor analysis instead of passing data
to a 32- or 64-bit host processor.
The upward compatibility of the Cortex M0 is a definite
advantage for developers. Compatibility with the FPGAbased
Corex M1 offfers some long-life options since future
designs can be moved from a discontinued chip to an FPGA.
Chips based on the Cortex M0 will likely arrive later this
year from Cortex M3 vendors such as Atmel, NXP, and Luminary
Micro. The Cortex M3 tools from vendors such as Keil
and IAR Systems already handle the Cortex M1 and, hence,
the Cortex M0.
It has been a couple of years since Luminary Micro hit
$1 with its Cortex M3 parts (see “32-Bit ARM MCU Hits
One-Dollar Mark” at www.electronicdesign.com, ED Online
12358). The Cortex M0 looks to push pricing to new lows
while delivering performance with new highs.
ARM
See Associated Poll
|