[Ideas For Design]
Redundant Power-Supply Diode Features Fanless Passive Cooling
Daniel Gomez-Ibanez
ED Online ID #21194
June 11, 2009
Copyright © 2006 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Printing of this document is for personal use only.
Reprints
A Schottky diode is an excellent way
to connect multiple batteries or dc power
supplies to a load. With a forward-biased
“or” diode between each supply and the
load, faults are isolated. Weak, low, or
shorted supplies can’t sink current from
the other supplies. Unfortunately, the heat
produced by a diode can be difficult to
remove in some applications. This circuit
was created to reduce the heat dissipated by
a power-supply “or” diode in a redundant
50-V supply.
We can replace an “or” diode with an
n-channel power FET. To match the behavior
of an “or” diode using a FET, the FET must be off when the
diode is reverse-biased. Therefore, we connect the FET’s gate to
the output of an amplifier, driving the gate low when the drain is
higher than the source (Fig. 1).
To prevent oscillation as the bias switches from reverse to forward,
a 60-mV input offset is created by unequal voltage dividers
on the op amp’s inputs. This small offset voltage becomes the
forward voltage drop of the ideal diode. The basic circuit has
only a few parts, yet the FET-based ideal diode must be carefully
controlled. Unlike an actual diode, we must consider stability, transient
response, and supply voltage range.
The feedback loop must be stable. The feedback path includes
a power FET. Its gate capacitance adds a pole to the open-loop
response, which can cause instability with a weak op amp or a high
gate capacitance. As long as the op amp can drive the capacitive
load of the FET gate with plenty of current, this pole will be above
the bandwidth of the op amp and won’t affect the loop’s stability.
Spice modeling can quantify the gain and phase margins of a particular
op-amp and FET combination.
In addition, transients must be handled gracefully. The ideal
diode response is slower than that of an actual diode, so it might be
damaged if it absorbs too much energy during a transition. If the
forward current increases quickly, the FET is protected. Its body
diode responds practically instantly and clamps the voltage across
the FET to less than 1 V. A few microseconds later, the op amp
drives the gate high to reduce voltage drop even further.
However, if the current switches from forward to reverse very
quickly, reverse current will flow until the op amp can turn off the
FET. The power dissipated during this transition can be unsafe
for the FET. The op amp must be fast enough to
respond quickly to this transition.
The circuit’s response to a fast reversal of current can be tested
with two power supplies and the 10-Ω load (Fig. 1, again). While
power-supply 1 delivers current to a load through the ideal diode,
it’s suddenly short-circuited by a mechanical switch (SW1). After
the switch is closed, the amplifier takes 30 µs to fully turn off the
FET. Reverse current peaks at 300 A, but the impulse energy is
only 0.15 joules, which is within the FET’s specified maximum
single-pulse avalanche energy. Figure 1 shows the test points, while
Figure 2 shows the oscilloscope traces immediately following the
short circuit of SW1.
Finally, operation must be safe across the entire range of possible
input voltage. If the op-amp supply voltage falls close to or below
the FET’s threshold, the ideal diode will never turn on and will dissipate
as much power as an actual diode. Its heatsink must therefore
handle the full power dissipated by the body diode alone. If
that’s not feasible, then brownout conditions must be detected and
avoided with an additional supply voltage comparator and power
switch (not shown here).
This diode was designed for low (6 mW) quiescent power, supply
voltage between 40 and 60 V, and current up to 10 A. Used
in place of a fan-cooled diode, the ideal diode reduces maximum
power dissipation from 7 W to less than 1 W, enabling passive cooling
without a fan.
|