View this week's entry ad »
Part Inventory
powered by:
Part Finder
Go
powered by:
  • Quick Poll
What Social Networking site do you use the most?



VOTE VIEW RESULTS
Previous Polls

Premium Content

Editors' Picks

Featured Industry Resources

Military And Avionics Applications Demand Rugged Hardware

Low power and heat dissipation are the keys to effective ruggedized designs—and ultimately victory on the battlefield. A platoon of products helps to achieve these goals.

By William Wong

September 24, 2009

Print
Reprints Comment

Not all military and avionic electronics need to be ruggedized, but unprotected systems would last only minutes in many of these environments. Thus, solutions such as rugged cases, conduction cooling, and highreliability connectors become mandatory design elements.

Elma’s air transport rack (ATR) 6U VPX is a good example of the starting point for military rugged designs (Fig. 1). The conductioncooled case has machined walls that act as integrated card guides. Its wedge locks transfer heat from the cards to the walls of the case. Designed for environments with temperature ranges of –40°C to 70°C, it meets a host of MIL-STD and ARINC specifications as well.

Another sealed ATR system, Mercury Computer Systems’ PowerBlock 50, is available with Intel and PowerPC processors and Xilinx FPGAs (Fig. 2). It supports x4 PCI Express switch fabric and can incorporate an internal hard or solid-state disk. Liquid cooling is an option.

The VPX and PowerBlock 50 highlight two key issues surrounding rugged designs—military, avionics, or otherwise. The first is environmental isolation, keeping sand and surf away from the electrical components. This is usually the easier of the two issues. The second is heat dissipation, which tends to involve heat redistribution away from the source (typically the electronics or its power source).

For example, the airframe houses the electronics in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) like the Predator from General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, but containing heat only makes the temperature rise. Conduction systems provide one way to move heat to an area where it can be dissipated. However, this approach often requires heat movement to different places around an aircraft.

Liquid cooling is one alternative to conduction cooling that promises high heat dissipation, providing a mechanism to move heat via a fluid to almost any point within a system. The challenge with liquid cooling is the infrastructure required. Normally, the cooling liquid is enclosed, and specially designed heatsinks transfer heat from hotspots such as the processor or GPUs to the cooling liquid. Also, pumps are required to move the liquid.

SPRAY COOLING
One alternative to liquid cooling is spray cooling from Spray- Cool, which uses liquid to cool a system without an enclosed fluid system like conventional water cooling. Instead, it uses a non-conductive dielectric liquid that’s distributed using a misting system. The mist condenses into a liquid and is drawn out using a series of drains. The system then acts like a conventional liquid cooling system with a pump that moves the liquid to a heat exchanger.

SprayCool offers a number of standard rack systems (Fig. 3). The company also can apply the technology to custom systems. The approach can be applied to an entire system with multiple boards. It also can be targeted like a conventional liquid cooling system, in which case it typically cools hot chips such as the main processor or a GPU.

Part of a design includes the spray system and the intakes for the condensed liquid. The number of intakes and their position depend on the operating environment. For example, an aircraft system where inverted operation is a possibility would normally have intakes all around the case interior, whereas a system that would be fixed could get by with a couple of intakes on the bottom where liquid would collect.

The SprayCool system can operate from –65°C to 71°C and altitudes up to 70,000 feet. As with other liquid-cooled systems, it can reduce overall weight by providing a more efficient cooling system. It’s a sealed system that can provide protection in hazardous environments where sand and water are the enemy. Finally, liquid cooling systems can handle significantly more heat dissipation than convection or conduction systems.

One advantage of the SprayCool approach versus conventional liquid cooling is that SprayCool can handle most hardware without modification. There’s no need for conformal coating or other special protection for the boards. SprayCool systems are finding homes in UAVs such as the Predator and the Northrop Grumman Global Hawk.

MORE RUGGED TECHNOLOGIES
Sealing and ruggedizing other system components is equally important. It doesn’t do much good if the electronics continue to run if the I/O systems no longer work. One example of a ruggedized display system is Eurotech’s 6.5-in. thin-film-transistor (TFT) LCD DuraVIS 4300 multifunction display (MFD) subsystem (Fig. 4).

The VGA-resolution, LED backlit display is readable in sunlight and can be dimmed down to 4%. It has 18 backlit keys. The MIL-STD-810F-qualified 4300 also has room for a pair of PC/104+ boards and comes with a 1-GHz Celeron M-based motherboard that’s preloaded with Linux or Windows XP Embedded.

It’s essentially a complete ruggedized PC, including the display. Another trend is the move toward solid-state storage, such as Elma’s ACT/Technico flash-memory storage. Its SecurStor and RAIDStor come with magnetic rotating disks or flash drives (see “ACT/Technico Sports CompactPCI And PMC Disk Storage”). Flash is more expensive, but it has no moving parts.

BACKPLANES FOR RUGGED SYSTEMS
Though many rugged systems are highly customized, they’re often based on standards such as VME. These backplane systems, which usually come in 3U and 6U form factors, are used with a range of approaches from convection cooling to spray cooling. Typically, more than half of the backplanes used in these commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) environments are customized versions of standard products. This is primarily due to the custom I/O on the backplane. These systems also usually have custom I/O out front as well.

VME is out in front with products like Kontron’s VM6250 multiprocessor board, which incorporates dual- or single-core Freescale MPC8640/8641 processors with Altivec vector processing support (Fig. 5). This 6U VME VITA 57-compliant board, which only uses 27 W, is available in convection- and conductioncooled versions. It supports the faster 320-Mbyte/s VME 2eSST bus speeds and has a pair of mezzanine sockets for PMC or highspeed serial XMC cards. It also features an FMC slot.

Continue to page 2

Average ( Ratings):
Filed Under:

Check for price and availability on Source ESB:

Go
powered by  

Related Products

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Now

Acceptable Use Policy

Sponsored Links