View this week's entry ad »
Part Inventory
powered by:
Part Finder
Go
powered by:
  • Quick Poll
What Social Networking site do you use the most?



VOTE VIEW RESULTS
Previous Polls
Hotspots » Analog & Mixed SignalPowerEmbedded

Premium Content

Editors' Picks

Featured Industry Resources

Hitting An HD HomeRun

By William Wong

December 21, 2009

Print
Reprints Comment Subscribe

I’ve built a number of multimedia PC systems but they employed PC-based TV tuners. These worked well but they are a pain to setup. Likewise, the PC needs to be near a cable connection.

This time around the project is based around Silicon Dust’s HD HomeRun (Fig. 1). This is a network-based HDTV tuner system. It actually has a pair of tuners with independent inputs. These can be connected to the same source via an external splitter or different sources such as an antenna and a cable system.

The HD HomeRun has its own microcontroller but no mass storage. For that we turn to VIA Technologies tiny ARTiGO 1000 box. The box is tiny but it can easily handle a half terabyte 2.5-in drive from Toshiba.

The ARTiGO and HD HomeRun are separated by an Ethernet network. This tends to be easier to contend with in my house that is wired for Ethernet. The HD HomeRun sits in the basement were that cable TV comes in and the ARTiGO is attached to an HDTV in another room.

Multiple HD HomeRun’s can be used on a network but the ARTiGO is likely to be overwhelmed by more than one depending upon whether the ARTiGO is handling playback chores as well.

Before covering system set up we take a look at the major components.

HD HomeRun
Silicon Dust’s HD HomeRun is a simple device with only four connections: power, 100BaseT Ethernet and a pair of cable connections. All configuration is done via remote management. Windows and Linux applications are provided by Silicon Dust.

HD HomeRun handles the recording chores but requires a back end server to store and play back HD video. The back end server can be the same PC as the playback device or it can be different depending upon the software employed.

HD HomeRun supports most platforms including Windows Media Center, Elgato EyeTV, MythTV, SnapStream BeyondTV, SageTV, MediaPortal, GB-PVR, VLCand TSReader. I use MythTV since I have a number of systems already set up for both recording and playback. This ranges from systems attached to TVs and HDTVs as well as PCs on the network. Multiple HD HomeRun servers can be accessed by multiple devices. This is not too bad with a gigabit Ethernet network but too many HD HomeRun systems on one network segment can max out the bandwidth of the system. A couple systems on a 100 Mbit/s Ethernet system works quite well. A good gigabit Ethernet switch does wonders for this configuration.

I run through system set up later but the HD HomeRun configuration is minimal. All the tends to be required is the ID for the device and the configuration programs provide this information.

The HD HomeRun can handle resolutions up to 1080i. It cannot handle CableCards needed for encrypted channels making it a challenge for satellite systems and fiber systems like Verizon’s FIOS. It worked well for broadcast channels on my Comcast cable but Comcast delivers different content on channels via an HD set top box or DVR versus direct connection to cable. Still, Comcast in my area provides a significant number of channels via QAM that is supported by HD HomeRun.

Toshiba Hard Drive
Toshiba’s MKxx55GSX hard drives (Fig. 2) are available in capacities from 120 Gbytes up to the half terabyte we used. This family runs at 5400 rpm while the MKxx55GSY line runs at 7200 rpm. The 5400 rpm drives tend to find a home in laptop and mobile devices.

Both support the 3 Gbit/s SATA transfer rate and 500 Gbyte capacity but most of the other specs are different. For example, the spin up power requirement is 5.5W for the faster drive but only 4.5W for the slower drive. Sleep mode sips only 0.13W. The faster drive has a 16 Kbyte cache with its slower sibling halving this amount.

The MKxx55GSX does have some advantages other than being a lower power drive. It is also quieter. The idle and seek averages are 1.8 and 2.0 bels while the MKxx55GSY is 2.5 and 2.8 bels. Of course, the MKxx55GSX is a little lighter on its feet by 0.4 oz.

The high capacity is a definite benefit when it comes to handling HD streams.

ARTiGO 1000 Take 2
I used an updated ARTiGO 1000 (see “VIA ARTiGO: Small But Powerful,” ED Online ID #19635) this time around. The latest ARTiGO incarnation (Fig. 3) looks identical to its earlier version. Both use the Pico-ITX (Fig. 4) motherboard. The Pico-ITX board has IDE and SATA interfaces but the initial version only supported IDE drives within the ARTiGO box.

The new version retains the IDE adapter but adds a SATA (Fig. 5). The cable has a right angle connection on one end. This is needed because of the tight confines of the ARTiGO box. The cable is the right length so excess cable does not have to be hidden somewhere.

Average ( Ratings):
Filed Under:

Check for price and availability on Source ESB:

Go
powered by  

Related Products

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Now

Acceptable Use Policy

Sponsored Links