Premium Content

New Signal Chain Resources from Texas Instruments:

Important Wireless Facts To Keep In Mind

Date Posted: March 25, 2010 12:00 AM
Author: Lou Frenzel

When selecting and applying wireless modules in a wireless sensor and actuator network (WSAN), keep some of these facts in mind:

• The range of each module is a function of transmitted power, antenna gain, and wavelength (λ). The greater the transmit power (Pt), transmit and receive antenna gains (Gt and Gr), and wavelength (λ), the higher the received power (Pr) for a given distance (d) or range. This is summed up in the basic Friis formula:

Pr = PtGtGrλ2 /16π2λ2

The key takeaway is that the range is greater at longer wavelengths or low frequencies.

• Path loss in dB can be estimated with the modified expression:

dB = (1/GrGt)(4πd/λ)2

Another path loss estimator is:

dB = 32.4 + 20log(f) + 20log(d) where d is in km and f is in MHz.

• For the popular 2.4-GHz band, the path loss can be estimated with:

dB = 40.2 + 20log(D) with d in meters and ≤ 8 m

dB = 58.3 + 33log(d/8) for d ≥ 8 m

For all these path loss calculations, assume a clear line-of-sight (LOS) path.

• Obstacles like walls, floors, and trees add from 3 to 18 dB to the path losses, depending upon the wall and floor composition and the frequency of operation. There is less loss at the lower frequencies. Brick and concrete have a higher attenuation than wood frame and sheet rock.

• At higher frequencies (2.4 GHz and beyond), reflections and multipath become a problem if there are many nearby objects.

• Lower frequencies are generally preferred but require longer antennas or less efficient shorter antennas.

Part Inventory
Go
powered by:
 

 
You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
  • cgosh
    2 years ago
    Aug 14, 2010

    Title is misleading, should be "dB Loss Equations for Engineers"
    Could have included starters on 2.4 gHz losses in water/fog/ice, interference, antenna wavelength and orientation, antenna types, grounding/reflectors, high-freq. construction techniques, many more pertinent topics to be complete.

  • cgosh
    2 years ago
    Aug 14, 2010

    Title is misleading, should be "dB Loss Equations for Engineers"
    Could have included starters on 2.4 gHz losses in water/fog/ice, interference, antenna wavelength and orientation, antenna types, grounding/reflectors, high-freq. construction techniques, many more pertinent topics to be complete.

  • CTHP
    2 years ago
    Aug 14, 2010

    Typo in the denominator, yes?

  • CTHP
    2 years ago
    Aug 14, 2010

    Typo in the denominator, yes?

  • rutman
    2 years ago
    Aug 03, 2010

    if you got the friss equation right the rest of your article would carry more weight

  • rutman
    2 years ago
    Aug 03, 2010

    if you got the friss equation right the rest of your article would carry more weight

  • rutman
    2 years ago
    Aug 03, 2010

    if you hadn't munged the friis euqation the rest of your article would carry more weight

  • rutman
    2 years ago
    Aug 03, 2010

    if you hadn't munged the friis euqation the rest of your article would carry more weight

  • rutman
    2 years ago
    Aug 03, 2010

    if you hadn't munged the friis euqation the rest of your article would carry more weight

  • rutman
    2 years ago
    Aug 03, 2010

    if you hadn't munged the friis euqation the rest of your article would carry more weight