• Channels
Part Inventory
Go
 
powered by:

 
  • Quick Poll
What Social Networking site do you use the most?



VOTE VIEW RESULTS
Previous Polls

Premium Content

New Signal Chain Technical Papers from Texas Instruments:

 

 

 

Apple Feels Antenna Angst As Form Trumps Function


Louis E. Frenzel

July 20, 2010

Print
Reprints Comment Subscribe

As you’ve probably heard, Apple’s new iPhone 4 has an antenna problem. The metal band holding the two thin glass panels that make up the housing serves as the main antenna for the phone. If you hold the phone in a certain way, now known as the “death grip,” the signal is attenuated and dropped calls are likely. The thin black insulating strip at the bottom left of the phone is the weak point. If you “short” that out with your hand or finger, you will significantly reduce the antenna effectiveness.

It’s hard to say just how big a problem this is with current users, but it has generated many complaints. The biggest concern Apple has is that word of this defect could hurt sales. So far, the company does not seem to be losing that many sales, but who knows? Consumer Reports issued a statement saying that it could not recommend the iPhone 4. That’s not good.

Some people have said that a recall of the phone is possible, but that does not seem to be what Apple really has in mind. At a press conference on Friday, Apple admitted the problem and offered to give iPhone 4 owners an insulated case that effectively solves it (see “Jobs Refutes iPhone 4 “Antennagate” Hype,”). Some users have also solved the problem by putting a piece of tape over the black insulator. Ah, another unexpected use for duct tape. Latex gloves probably work too.

How about a Bluetooth headset? With the iPhone in a case on your belt and the Bluetooth headset in your ear, I suspect it would work just fine.

Apple also has admitted that the software controlling the signal level bars is out of whack. The bars apparently do not provide the real story about signal level, possibly accounting for some of the problem. I suspect that this aside is just a mental trick to make users think things are better than they are. Maybe I’m wrong about that.

But I suspect that when this level of money and image are involved, a company will say anything to make things seem better. None of those bar displays are very accurate anyway. They simply offer a relative indication of signal as produced by a typically not-so-accurate received signal strength indicator (RSSI) reading from the receiver. It’s better than nothing, but don’t count on 100% accuracy. RF is too fickle.

When I first heard of this problem, I had to say, well, didn’t an antenna engineer design this piece? The answer is yes. But reports say that when Apple’s antenna guy complained that it was a bad electrical design, the packaging design guys overruled him, probably Steve Jobs himself. In the Apple tradition, style and physical design are everything, and Apple has been very successful over the years with this approach. I suppose it had to come back to bite Apple at some point. In any case, form beat function for a bad outcome.

The Perils Of Antenna Design
Anyway, as an RF person myself with lots of hands-on antenna design experience, I can tell you that touching an antenna is a really bad thing. This is especially true of antennas that operate in the 800-MHz to 1.9-GHz range. Just getting near an antenna will distort its radiation pattern and reduce its efficiency. Touching one is almost as bad as disconnecting it. Cell-phone designers have had difficulties from the very beginning in putting an antenna inside the case.

Remember those extendable whip antennas on early cell phones? They were troublesome and ugly, but they worked. Now antennas are all inside as new designs have come into being. But putting that antenna near your hand and head really attenuates the signal and changes its radiation pattern significantly. Antennas are designed to account for this, but it doesn’t include physically making contact with the conductors. I’m actually amazed that the iPhone 4 antenna works at all with someone touching it.

I was reminded of this problem as I was developing some lab experiments for a college wireless class recently. I used 915-MHz industrial-scientific-medical (ISM) band transceivers with half-wave vertical antennas. They work fine, but getting within a few inches of the antenna really messes up the transmission.

Continue to next page

Average (0 Ratings):

Subscribe
Subscribe to Electronic Design and start receiving more articles like this one
Filed Under:

Check for price and availability on Source ESB:

Go
powered by  
  • jtruchsess
    2 years ago
    Jul 22, 2010

    What a load of bollocks. My iPhone 4 has great reception, better than that of my iPhone 3G. I can press directly on the area in question with very little signal loss, and with the bumper case it's a non-issue. All internal-antenna cellphones are affected to some extent by body proximity; Apple is being pilloried by sour-grapes types due to their massive success. The columnists comment "In the Apple tradition, style and physical design are everything" is completely gratuitous and unfair. Yes, Apple has brilliant I.D., but their products are also the most functional in the industry.

  • jtruchsess
    2 years ago
    Jul 22, 2010

    What a load of bollocks. My iPhone 4 has great reception, better than that of my iPhone 3G. I can press directly on the area in question with very little signal loss, and with the bumper case it's a non-issue. All internal-antenna cellphones are affected to some extent by body proximity; Apple is being pilloried by sour-grapes types due to their massive success. The columnists comment "In the Apple tradition, style and physical design are everything" is completely gratuitous and unfair. Yes, Apple has brilliant I.D., but their products are also the most functional in the industry.

  • jtruchsess
    2 years ago
    Jul 22, 2010

    What a load of bollocks. My iPhone 4 has great reception, better than that of my iPhone 3G. I can press directly on the area in question with very little signal loss, and with the bumper case it's a non-issue. All internal-antenna cellphones are affected to some extent by body proximity; Apple is being pilloried by sour-grapes types due to their massive success. The columnists comment "In the Apple tradition, style and physical design are everything" is completely gratuitous and unfair. Yes, Apple has brilliant I.D., but their products are also the most functional in the industry.

  • jtruchsess
    2 years ago
    Jul 22, 2010

    What a load of bollocks. My iPhone 4 has great reception, better than that of my iPhone 3G. I can press directly on the area in question with very little signal loss, and with the bumper case it's a non-issue. All internal-antenna cellphones are affected to some extent by body proximity; Apple is being pilloried by sour-grapes types due to their massive success. The columnists comment "In the Apple tradition, style and physical design are everything" is completely gratuitous and unfair. Yes, Apple has brilliant I.D., but their products are also the most functional in the industry.

  • jtruchsess
    2 years ago
    Jul 22, 2010

    What a load of bollocks. My iPhone 4 has great reception, better than that of my iPhone 3G. I can press directly on the area in question with very little signal loss, and with the bumper case it's a non-issue. All internal-antenna cellphones are affected to some extent by body proximity; Apple is being pilloried by sour-grapes types due to their massive success. The columnists comment "In the Apple tradition, style and physical design are everything" is completely gratuitous and unfair. Yes, Apple has brilliant I.D., but their products are also the most functional in the industry.

  • jta@probesci.com
    2 years ago
    Jul 21, 2010

    Holding the antenna - or holding the box containing the antenna has similar effects - what is not clear from the hype is what is the intended counterpoise of the antenna, if an unbalanced design; or if a balanced design, how is balance maintained in the different operational scenarios - no hands, hands, pockets, etc. The only requirement for radiation (physics 1) is that charge separation be observable in the far field, and that the charge be moving. I suspect its time for Apple to utilize diversity - two or more antennas assigned to the same communication task - if one is nulled, perhaps the others won't be.

  • jta@probesci.com
    2 years ago
    Jul 21, 2010

    Holding the antenna - or holding the box containing the antenna has similar effects - what is not clear from the hype is what is the intended counterpoise of the antenna, if an unbalanced design; or if a balanced design, how is balance maintained in the different operational scenarios - no hands, hands, pockets, etc. The only requirement for radiation (physics 1) is that charge separation be observable in the far field, and that the charge be moving. I suspect its time for Apple to utilize diversity - two or more antennas assigned to the same communication task - if one is nulled, perhaps the others won't be.

  • jta@probesci.com
    2 years ago
    Jul 21, 2010

    Holding the antenna - or holding the box containing the antenna has similar effects - what is not clear from the hype is what is the intended counterpoise of the antenna, if an unbalanced design; or if a balanced design, how is balance maintained in the different operational scenarios - no hands, hands, pockets, etc. The only requirement for radiation (physics 1) is that charge separation be observable in the far field, and that the charge be moving. I suspect its time for Apple to utilize diversity - two or more antennas assigned to the same communication task - if one is nulled, perhaps the others won't be.

  • jta@probesci.com
    2 years ago
    Jul 21, 2010

    Holding the antenna - or holding the box containing the antenna has similar effects - what is not clear from the hype is what is the intended counterpoise of the antenna, if an unbalanced design; or if a balanced design, how is balance maintained in the different operational scenarios - no hands, hands, pockets, etc. The only requirement for radiation (physics 1) is that charge separation be observable in the far field, and that the charge be moving. I suspect its time for Apple to utilize diversity - two or more antennas assigned to the same communication task - if one is nulled, perhaps the others won't be.

  • jta@probesci.com
    2 years ago
    Jul 21, 2010

    Holding the antenna - or holding the box containing the antenna has similar effects - what is not clear from the hype is what is the intended counterpoise of the antenna, if an unbalanced design; or if a balanced design, how is balance maintained in the different operational scenarios - no hands, hands, pockets, etc. The only requirement for radiation (physics 1) is that charge separation be observable in the far field, and that the charge be moving. I suspect its time for Apple to utilize diversity - two or more antennas assigned to the same communication task - if one is nulled, perhaps the others won't be.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
Acceptable Use Policy

Sponsored Links