Premium Content

New Signal Chain Resources from Texas Instruments:

If You Build A Smart Battery Charger, Beware The Consequences

Date Posted: February 11, 2011 09:15 AM
Author: Anoop Hegde

Build A Smart Battery Charger Using A Single-Transistor Circuit,” an Idea for Design, has generated lots of traffic since it was first published on November 25, 2002. But it has a serious flaw that makes it unsafe and less reliable, either in a product or in a hobby circuit to be used at home.  

The main problem with the circuit is that the battery-charging current is totally uncontrolled, so it is not suitable to charge any battery that is expected to have a reasonable operating life. This circuit also can be dangerous and cause a fire hazard, depending on the type of battery and the transformer being used.

If a sealed lead-acid battery is charged with excessive current, its gasket may blow. If a flooded lead-acid battery is charged with excessive current, water will evaporate, increasing acid concentration and reducing battery capacity. If a nickel-cadmium (NiCD) or nickel-metal-hydride (NiMH) battery gets excessive charging current, internal pressure will rise, possibly bursting the cell. If a lithium-ion (Li-ion) or lithium-polymer (Li-poly) battery gets excessive charging current, its temperature will rise and it may catch fire and burn. This can happen even before the battery voltage rises to a preset charging-stop level set by trimmers. Hence, RL1 won’t prevent battery damage.

In addition, this Idea for Design does not specify the load current rating for transformer T1 or the capacity and type of battery BT1, both of which are important for design. Consider two scenarios.

In the first scenario, transformer T1 is a heavy-duty device that supplies high load current. As a result, it has low winding resistance. Battery BT1 is a low-capacity device, i.e., it has a larger internal resistance. For example, T1 and BT1 are a 12-V/4-A transformer and 9-V/1-AH battery, respectively.

With ac power on and battery voltage lower than the threshold set by a trim-pot, relay RL1 is off and the output of diode D2 is directly connected to the battery. The 12-V transformer and bridge-rectifier and filter (C1) configuration generate an open circuit voltage of:

12*(sqrt(2)) = 16.8 V at pin1 of D2 (or 16.3 V at pin2 of D2)

This voltage is directly applied across the battery terminals, so the charge current is only limited by the winding resistance of the transformer and internal resistance of the battery. The charge current essentially is uncontrolled and will destroy the battery due to excessive heating or buildup of excessive pressure inside the battery even before the battery voltage rises high enough for RL1 to disconnect the charging circuit.

I wouldn’t want to be near BT1 if it were a Li-ion battery when it was getting charged because it would be sure to explode, catch fire, and burn.

In the second scenario, the transformer isn’t a heavy-duty device, but the battery has a high capacity. For example, there is a 12-V/1-A transformer and 9-V/10-AH battery. Since such a battery will have relatively low internal resistance, it will essentially present a short to 9 V at pin2 (cathode) of D2.

Continue on next page

Part Inventory
Go
powered by:
 

 
You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
  • Bert Koehler
    1 year ago
    Feb 15, 2011

    @ Patrick.
    Ah, you spoke too soon. 100 watt bulbs really have been outlawed, in California. This is no joke. see: http://cubachi.com/2010/12/27/more-dim-bulbs-california-banning-100-watt-incandescent-light-bulbs/
    for details. It is appalling that they can actually get away with this.

  • Patrick Jankowiak
    1 year ago
    Feb 14, 2011

    come on. don't be sissy! We used to charge lead acid batteries off 120VAC with tungar bulbs in series with 100W lamps, and with worse things before that. Anyone taking a circuit of any type right out of a magazine and using it without care or knowledge is going to get a surprise. It is not necessary to state the kind of relay because the builder is expected to know enough to figure it out. The only thing missing from the original article is a long and detailed instruction sheet. It's not for consumers but it could be, It is extremely obvious that the transformer and rectifier should be no different than what is found in any battery charger at wal-mart (except they are usually full wave center tap and have a self-resetting circuit breaker). You know the kind. handle, 0-25A meter, thick wires and a set of clamps. The one-transistor circuit would make a nice add-on for that kind of charger. And that charger's long instructions sheet. I appreciate the criticism of the author's work, but I do not believe the circuit was ever intended to be an end to things and I disagree with condemnation of the circuit itself. Beware I still have a couple of those Tungars and 100W lamps have not been outlawed, yet.

  • Brad Wood
    1 year ago
    Feb 14, 2011

    Well---like so many other "free" things, like advice, this was worth about what people paid for it. It would have been helpful if the author gave data on the battery at least. Knowing what the relay was would be helpful too. And is that really a 470 millifarad cap? More likely micro is intended, which also leads to some rather high ripple currents. Perhaps it was sized empirically to be just sufficient to prevent relay chatter or other acoustical buzzing?

  • David Guy
    1 year ago
    Feb 14, 2011

    The Orginal Circuit is usefull, except I would likly put a series resistor to limit the current to the safe trickle charge current specified depending on battery type.