• Channels
Part Inventory
Go
 
powered by:

 
  • Quick Poll
What Social Networking site do you use the most?



VOTE VIEW RESULTS
Previous Polls

Premium Content

New Signal Chain Technical Papers from Texas Instruments:

 

 

 

Standard Footprints Hide Design Diversity
Sponsored by: RO ASSOCIATES


Don Tuite

May 12, 2005

Print
Reprints Comment Subscribe

Not Just About POLs
When looking at the Intermediate Bus Architecture (IBA), there is a tendency to focus on point-of-load (POL) dc-dc converters and the various control and monitoring schemes while skipping over the upstream bus converter that steps down the front end's 48 V to the bus-distribution voltage. In fact, a great deal can be said about bus converters. Not all bricks are created equal.

Input Voltage Range's Big Impact
Apart from physical dimensions, brick converters differ the most in their input voltage ranges. IBA designers who have to meet legacy telco specifications must select wide-input (36- to 75-V) bus converters, even though the outputs of modern ac-dc front ends will never see swings that wide. Engineers designing for IT applications or for the communications infrastructure in developing countries can select narrow input-range converters with more efficiency and higher power densities than their wide-range cousins. A narrow input range gives the brick designer freedom to leave the output unregulated. If the input range doesn't vary much, variations in output will be small, because the transformer turns ratio constrains them.

Click here to download the PDF version of this entire article.

Average (0 Ratings):

Subscribe
Subscribe to Electronic Design and start receiving more articles like this one
Filed Under:

Check for price and availability on Source ESB:

Go
powered by  
    There are no comments to display. Be the first one!
You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
Acceptable Use Policy

Sponsored Links