Premium Content

New Signal Chain Resources from Texas Instruments:

Part Inventory
Go
powered by:
 

 

Will Nanotubes Become The New Asbestos?

Date Posted: March 15, 2011 03:49 AM
Author: Paul Whytock

There is no question that nano technology holds enormous engineering promise. Not least amongst that is the huge contribution to the advancement of electronics that nanotubes are already recognised as having. 

But in the enthusiastic rush to capitalise on this technology has industry recognised the potential health risks that nanotubes may hold that could prove similar to those presented by asbestos fibres?

In terms of product innovation nano technology is already showing how it can radically effect transistor design. A while back Dutch scientists managed to create a nanotube activated transistor that could toggle on and off with the flow of a single electron. The point here is that

conventional transistors require the movement of millions of

electrons, and that naturally causes heat. Also today’s transistor can only be shrunk to a certain size. A single electron switch, on the other hand avoids these size constraints.

Cancer Risk

However, lurking in the background is a darker side to nanotube technology. It relates to a potential health hazard that could effect thousands of people in the electronics industry.

Because nanotubes are microscopic, it is known they can infiltrate the human body via the lungs, skin, and digestive system. They are similar in structure to asbestos fibres, and we know the proven latent danger of those and the high incidence of mesothelioma developing years after inhalation.

The action of microscopic nanotubes in the lungs holds similar risks. Once in the lung, physicians consider it unlikely that the macrophages would be able to remove tissue damaged by them, especially when the invading nanotube had travelled beyond the lung surfactant. Recent research on mice confirms this fact.

So the dangers are there, and when nanotubes become viable as a commercial production process industry management must react to ensure the safety of employees. Failure to do that could be as costly and painful as the legacy of ignorance surrounding the use of asbestos.

 

Subscribe to Electronic Design and start receiving more blogs like this one!
asbestos|mesothelioma|nanotubes
You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
  • Moncler Homme
    6 months ago
    Nov 08, 2011

    Today you need only visit a web, find your Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler Pas Cher or coat and buy it. Women can take Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler Blouson – with its 3/4 length, feather down lined, in the same time men enjoyed knee-length jacket with 2 pockets, or Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler Homme for Men. Whatever you choose from Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler" rel="nofollow">www.doudoune-moncler-2012.com/">Moncler Femme collection – it is the best clothing.

  • William Ketel
    1 year ago
    May 30, 2011

    I agree that the physical characteristics of carbon nanotubes does make them a potential hazard. My question is quite "pointed", which is, what happens the first time a fairly large container of these things is damaged? I am talking about somebody dropping a 1-pound container that shatters when it hits the floor. The accident may be a bit more complex, but that is the sort of thing that I can easily imagine happening. My question is "then what happens?" Before the guys in the hazmat suits arrive, all of the stuff has been blown away by a vent fan, or a fume-hood vent system. What happens next?

  • frames
    1 year ago
    Apr 06, 2011

    Nanu tube will follow a well known narrative.
    Red fiberglass commonly used for insulation is just as damaging to the lungs as asbestos but is ignored as a health hazards. The cost involved in recognizing it and the impact on companies is too high. In fact it is being used in the last 30 years (or more) for testing of equipments such as asbestos filters and vacuums because it behaves the same as asbestos but is unregulated and cheaper to handle and disposed. 20 years ago there was some awareness of the danger and people in contact with it were using face masks which slightly reduce the risk but is far from eliminating it. Today even PBS old house fox ignore the need for protection around fiberglass. Companies will not adjust packaging design, standards practices, handling and usage instructions since that would be an admission of knowledge and will open them to liability lawsuits. Congress is there to protect industry profitability the American way, so no action will be taken until we see the effect which can take 30 years or more to show. We are due now to for an increase in lung cancer related to the jump in usage of fiberglass for insulation related to the energy crises of the 1970's and insulation practices which became popular in the 1980's. Nanu tube will probably follow the same narrative. See this 1974 government report. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.../>

  • ShipofFools
    1 year ago
    Apr 06, 2011

    The concern here is only employees? Don't get me wrong, that's great. And true, they will have the most exposure, at least at first. But what happens to all the nanotubes that are made? Do these things harmlessly biodegrade? or breakdown naturally via another mechanism? If they don't, then what happens to them? Nothing. They just accumulate. We will be surrounded by higher and higher levels of this stuff, and we can't even see it. If they are harmful to workers using protective gear, they will be harmful to everyone/everything when environmental levels are high enough. And don't assume that a finished product made out of nano-stuff is perfectly stable forever, and won't shed nanoparticles like dandruff. A worker may handle a product for 5 minutes, but an end-user might handle it for years.

  • EE Not So Wary
    1 year ago
    Apr 06, 2011

    Taking basic precautions? Sure. Wig out? No. Same goes for asbestos. What most studies leave out of the asbestos and mesothelioma links is smoking. My uncle worked in the shipyards all his life, post-WWI and thru WWII and beyond. In fact, one of his jobs was to spray asbestos insulation in the ships. Yes, spray it. He lived a ripe old age of 86 and died from causes totally unrelated to asbestos. Many of his co-workers died much younger. The difference was that he did not smoke. The combination of smoking and asbestos is deadly.

  • TedT
    1 year ago
    Apr 06, 2011

    I've often pondered the very same question, and it's time someone asked it. "Accidents" wityh new materials date back to the Curies and later more hazardous materials. Here are two of them:
    * Bisphenol-A is another hazardous chemical added to make plastic flexible. Plastic baby bottles came out a few years ago with labels claiming no bispehnol-A. * MSG is another problem which gives many people migraines. But MSG has at least 8 very different names few people know about. Now we have nanotubes! When will it all end?

  • Jon Wesenberg
    1 year ago
    Apr 06, 2011

    I know a researcher working for the US CDC/NIOSH workplace safety agency who is developing airborne nanoparticle detection equipment techniques. Nanoparticle hazards will definitely need to be monitored and addressed in workplaces where these materials are used. Detectors will be as important in these facilities as fire, chemical and explosive hazard detection is today in many industrial settings.