Simple Current-Loop Transmitter Converts PWM To 4-to-20-mA Output

Nov. 20, 2000
Over long cable runs, an isolated 4-to-20-mA current loop offers robust noise immunity and tolerance. This characteristic makes it popular for analog data transmission in noisy industrial and process control environments. Unfortunately, the...

Over long cable runs, an isolated 4-to-20-mA current loop offers robust noise immunity and tolerance. This characteristic makes it popular for analog data transmission in noisy industrial and process control environments. Unfortunately, the conversion of a digital output to an isolated current-loop signal is a relatively complicated proposition. In addition to the actual signal isolator components, paraphernalia such as multiple floating power supplies and DACs are typically required.

A simpler scheme is used for this circuit (Fig. 1). It’s based on pulse-width modulation to implement a cheap but accurate current-loop transmitter. A dual-channel isolator (E1-E2-Q1-Q2) provides galvanic isolation of the PWM input. It uses this input to chop the 1.25-V reference voltage of the LT317AT regulator in response to the 1- to 2-kHz PWM input applied to the E1/E2 LED pair. Phototransistors Q1 and Q2 switch R4 between the top and bottom ends of the R1/R2 current-set resistance.

The pulse-width duty factor of the PWM input varies between 0% and 100%. At the same time, the dc component of the isolated analog waveform sourced to R4 varies from 0.25 to 0.0 V relative to A1-pin 3. A1’s low-pass, gain-of-four filter extracts this dc portion and applies it to the adjust pin of VR1. This allows the voltage between the VR1 adjust and A1-pin 3 to fluctuate from 1.0 to 0.0 V. As a result, the voltage across the R1/R3 resistance varies from 0.25 V (at a duty factor of 0) to 1.25 V (at a duty factor of unity). Consequently, a 4- to 20-mA current is drawn from the out terminal of VR1 and circulated in the output loop.

The full-scale 20-mA output is trimmed via R1. The impedance of the low-pass filter network is quite high (≈ 3 MΩ). This limits the phototransistor saturation offset to ≈ 1 mV. Meanwhile, the picoamp-level bias current of A1 prevents these big resistors surrounding its summing point from causing significant errors. Relatively long (tens of milliseconds) filter time-constants are needed for adequate ripple reduction. The high-feedback network impedances allow this to be achieved with only modestly sized capacitors.

Performance of the resulting current loop is respectable. The 1% guaranteed tolerances of the critical components (VR1, R1, and R2) yield typical accuracies greater than 8 bits. Resolution, differential linearity, and monotonicity are equal to that of the PWM digital waveform—that is, except in cases where the duty factor values are smaller than 0.01% or larger than 99.99%. At these extremes, the control signal may spend less time in the zero or one state than is required by the isolator to completely switch from one rail to the other. This results in a modest increase in differential nonlinearity for this very restricted range of values.

With risetimes less than 100 ms, the settling time to 0.1% is less than 500 ms. The output ripple is less than 0.01% of full scale. If the dc-dc converter is omitted, passive transmitter operation displays a voltage compliance spanning 7 to 45 V. In other words, it ranges from the minimum voltage drop necessary for proper operation to the maximum operating voltage of VR1.

The dependence of the output current upon loop voltage is less than 50 ppm/V over the whole range. This is due to the excellent line regulation behavior of VR1. Adding the dc-dc converter enables active transmitter operation with an isolated output compliance of 24 V. All circuit power comes from a single groundreferred 5-V rail.

A number of methods can be used to generate the PWM input. In microcontroller-based applications (e.g., Motorola 68HC12), the onchip counter/timer hardware can provide a convenient source. Figure 2 illustrates another possibility. This idea uses a constantfrequency PWM multivibrator that was derived from an earlier IFD (“A New Stable RC Pulse Generator,” Feb. 8, 1999, p. 104-106). That circuit is adapted to digital control via the Xicor X9440 dual “smart analog” comparator/potentiometer combination. The convenience of the X9440’s strapless-address SPI interface partially makes up for its somewhat limited (6-bit) resolution.

Sponsored Recommendations

Near- and Far-Field Measurements

April 16, 2024
In this comprehensive application note, we delve into the methods of measuring the transmission (or reception) pattern, a key determinant of antenna gain, using a vector network...

DigiKey Factory Tomorrow Season 3: Sustainable Manufacturing

April 16, 2024
Industry 4.0 is helping manufacturers develop and integrate technologies such as AI, edge computing and connectivity for the factories of tomorrow. Learn more at DigiKey today...

Connectivity – The Backbone of Sustainable Automation

April 16, 2024
Advanced interfaces for signals, data, and electrical power are essential. They help save resources and costs when networking production equipment.

Empowered by Cutting-Edge Automation Technology: The Sustainable Journey

April 16, 2024
Advanced automation is key to efficient production and is a powerful tool for optimizing infrastructure and processes in terms of sustainability.

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!