Low-Energy Bluetooth And Ant+ Merge Onto One Chip


ANT+ and Bluetooth low-energy wireless technology are now compatible thanks to a new SoC

Until recently, ANT+ and Bluetooth low-energy wireless technology were simply incompatible, forcing developers and end users to choose one or the other. Now such decision-making will likely fade into obsolescence thanks to a new multi-protocol system-on-a-chip (SoC) that offers concurrent ANT+ and Bluetooth low energy wireless communication. According to developer Nordic Semiconductor, the nRF51922 SoC is the first to offer this design advantage (see the figure).

ANT+ wireless technology allows monitoring devices to talk to each other, ensuring that users of ANT+ products can enjoy efficient access and use of data. It's all about interoperability, which simply means that such products from multiple brands work together.

ANT+ is a well-proven protocol and silicon solution for ultra-low-power (ULP) practical wireless-networking applications, facilitating interoperability between ANT+ Alliance member devices and automatic transfer and tracking of sensor data. It also defines device profiles, which is important because it specifies data formats, channel parameters, and network keys.

Low-Energy Functionality

Bluetooth low-energy technology extends wireless connectivity to applications powered by coin-cell batteries in consumer products. It operates in the internationally accepted 2.4-GHz Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) band, and maintains a physical-layer bit rate of 1 Mbit/s over a range up to 15 meters.

With this specification, Bluetooth v4.0 chips are able to integrate Bluetooth low-energy functionality into an existing classic Bluetooth controller. OEMs also can use current classic Bluetooth technology chips with the new Bluetooth low-energy stack.

Nordic Semiconductor believes the SoC makes it possible to use one or both protocols concurrently in a product, enabling multiprotocol accessories and compatibility with ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart Ready hubs. The device, which is compatible with existing nRF51 series designs, features the company’s new S310 SoftDevice that combines the ANT+ and Bluetooth low-energy stacks in a single software framework. The S310 also gives designers the same autonomous, secure, and event-driven application interface as existing Nordic SoftDevices.

Nordic S110 (Bluetooth low energy) and S210 (ANT+) SoftDevice users will find that the S310 has pin-compatible hardware and a familiar interface. As a result, customers that already have an nRF51 Series ANT+ or Bluetooth low-energy product will be able to keep existing hardware design and firmware. All that’s needed is firmware support for the new protocol stack when implementing the nRF51922.

Smart Architecture

The architecture of the nRF51 SoCs is designed to cut current consumption and enable single-chip implementations of various wireless applications. It includes a low-power 32-bit ARM Corte M0 processor with 2-µs startup time that minimizes active time and improves code density. Individual system blocks can be powered independently, and clocks can be controlled autonomously based on activity level. In addition, peripherals such as radio, timers, and I/O are able to interact autonomously with each other without involving the processor.

Another design advantage of this architecture is its separation between protocol stack and user-application code. The stacks are delivered as a pre-compiled binary or pre-programmed on devices. They’re 100% asynchronous and event-driven, and provide thread-safe Supervisor Call-based application program interfaces to the application layer.

Newsletter Signup

Please or Register to post comments.

What's London Calling?

Blogs on the electronics industry


Paul Whytock

Paul Whytock is European Editor for Penton Media's Electronics Division. From his base in London, England, he covers press conferences and industry events throughout the EU for Penton...
Commentaries and Blogs
Guest Blogs
Nov 11, 2014

How to Outsource Your Project to Failure 4

This article will address failure to carefully vet a potential manufacturing or “turnkey” partner and/or failure to transfer sufficient information and requirements to such a partner, a very common problem I have seen again and again with my clients over the years, and have been the shoulder cried upon by several relatives and clients in the past....More
Nov 11, 2014

Transition from the Academe to the Industry Unraveled 1

There have been many arguments here and there about how short-comings of universities and colleges yield engineers with skill sets that do not cater to the demands of the industry. There have been many arguments here and there about an imminent shortage of engineers lacking knowledge in the sciences. There have been many arguments here and there about how the experience and know-how of engineers in the industry may vanish due to the fact that they can’t be passed on because the academic curriculum deviates from it....More
Nov 11, 2014

Small Beginnings 5

About 10 years ago I received a phone call from an acquaintance. He had found a new opportunity selling some sort of investments and he wanted to share it with me in case I was interested. Ken had done fairly well for many years as a contract software developer primarily in the financial services sector. His specialty was writing RPG code. (RPG is often referred to as a write only language.) But he was seeing the handwriting on the wall as the industry moved on to other methods, and saw himself becoming a fossil....More

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×