Will RISC-V Rescue the Internet of Things?

RSS

The HiFive1 Arduino-form factor board

For those following the RISC-V space, SiFive's new Freedom E310 is a long-awaited milestone. For most, RISC-V is a relatively new notion.

In a nutshell, RISC-V is an instruction set architecture (ISA) that scales from 16-bit to 128-bit register platforms. The E310 is targets the Cortex-M0 space, but it can run at 320 MHz while sipping power—making it an interesting solution for the Internet of Things (IoT). The chip is available on the HiFive1 board (see figure) that has an Arduino form factor.

The idea behind RISC-V is not new. MIPS and even ARM have RISC-like architectures. Issues like code density and ISA functionality have fallen by the wayside, making other factors more important when deciding whether to use RISC-V. The performance or power efficiency is more a function of the microarchitecture implementation rather than the choice of ISA. Much of the success of the x86 CISC architecture is due to the plethora of software and platforms like Microsoft Windows. Much of ARM’s popularity is due to Linux and platforms like Android that are built on it.

So what does RISC-V offer? Customization at a lower cost compared to Imagination Technologies, MIPS, and ARM that essentially live off of licensing fees. These costs are passed on for standard parts like those available from micro vendors like Microchip, Qualcomm, and Texas Instruments and amortized across millions of chips. The infrastructures surrounding these two architectures are part of the benefit of using them. Availability of developers familiar with the platforms is another.

This type of community is what the E310 is designed to inspire. Likewise, the use of the IP in FPGAs is another option. Microsemi is supporting RISC-V. This makes a lot of sense as its competitors, Altera and Xilinx, have their own soft core processors (NIOS and MicroBlaze, respectively). Of course, RISC-V is one that can span all the FPGA vendors. The Cortex-M0 and -M1 are another, licensable option.

Now, the E310 core IP is open-source, but not all RISC-V implementations will be. There is the open-source Rocket core IP generator, which provides a good implementation for free. However, it isn't necessarily optimized like many of the MIPS and ARM solutions, or those that the micro vendors utilize. Still, the Rocket solutions may be more than sufficient for many developers. There are open-source peripheral and accelerator IP that can be used to create a final system-on-chip.

One reason this alternative to MIPS and ARM is of interest in the IoT space are aspects like customization requirements and cost, which can be significant. Low power and performance are typically on the checkbox list, but RISC-V fits nicely with all these aspects. SiFive can deliver a customized version of the E310 for about $100,000. That is a lot less than many alternatives.

Going with a custom chip for IoT applications has many advantages, ranging from optimizing power and performance to incorporating custom peripherals. Custom chips make reverse-engineering more difficult. Of course, using open-source or low-cost hardware helps the bottom line.

While processor chip vendors might consider adding RISC-V platforms to their stable, I think that will unlikely given the infrastructure and community they have already built up. The migration to ARM or MIPS platforms has taken years, and anyone considering a change would need to take these issues into account.

Custom IoT designs can benefit from an existing infrastructure and community, but are not as beholden to them. Likewise, much of this infrastructure is generic, such as the use of Eclipse-based IDEs and standard compiler technologies.

RISC-V is certainly worth watching. It may well fit into your IoT plans.

Discuss this Blog Entry 1

on Dec 8, 2016

Wasn't aware the IoT market needed to be saved! Deployments are occurring now. for it to really generate maximum benefit, we need systems to talk to systems. So fragmentation is certainly a block. Security and ownership of data are challenges of course. and there there is the complexity associated with deploying and managing systems in situ for their lifetime....Total cost of ownership means (we believe) a focus on software elements and creating a cohesive ecosystem around end to end security implementations.

Please or Register to post comments.

What's alt.embedded?

Blogs focusing on embedded, software and systems

Contributors

William Wong

Bill Wong covers Digital, Embedded, Systems and Software topics at Electronic Design. He writes a number of columns, including Lab Bench and alt.embedded, plus Bill's Workbench hands-on column....
Commentaries and Blogs
Guest Blogs
Jan 26, 2017
blog

An Amateur’s View on the P2 (Part 2): Slew Rate and the Oscillator 3

Justin Mamaradlo takes a further look into the P2 op amp and how it functions, analyzing the oscillation and slew-rate characteristics of the venerable component....More
Jul 15, 2016
blog

Simple Yet Effective ESD Testing Methods for Higher Reliability 11

There are multiple ways to test for electrostatic discharge, ranging from implementing a human-body or machine model to....using a balloon and a comb?...More
Apr 8, 2016
Commentary

Confabbing on the Fabless Fad 5

High capital and maintenance costs, and EDA advances along with abstractions to deal with chip complexity, have been leading contributors to the fabless migration....More

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×