Electronicdesign 8605 Ifd2635promo
Electronicdesign 8605 Ifd2635promo
Electronicdesign 8605 Ifd2635promo
Electronicdesign 8605 Ifd2635promo
Electronicdesign 8605 Ifd2635promo

Test Technique Quantifies Jitter of Discrete-Comparator Design

May 10, 2016
Testing high-performance designs for parameters such as jitter is not easy, but this circuit, when used with a standard, high-end mixed-signal oscilloscope, yields accurate and meaningful results.
Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high-resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

A colleague asked for the measured jitter number on a single-supply comparator design based on the LM359 IC.1 He wanted to know how the jitter performance of the discrete comparator compared to an IC comparator, which was used with an ultrasound application.

To set up the test, a special power-supply circuit was designed for the comparator as well as for a crystal-clock module with specified jitter. The power supply, clock, and comparator of the circuit (Fig. 1) were placed on a single printed circuit board (PCB) with ground plane. The board used a special scope probe-tip test point with a fitted, spiral ground wire, into which the probe’s ground-sleeve can fit.  (This technique is often employed to reduce parasitic ringing and give a good return ground.) The rms jitter for this commercially available crystal-based clock module (CTS MXO45HS-3C-1M0000, 5 ps maximum) was better than the comparator could provide.

1. In the PCB of the circuit used to test the comparator with a low-jitter clock, the dual comparator is on the far right (one comparator is active, the second is "tied off" as a spare) and the CTS 1-MHz clock module is in the board center.

In the circuit (Fig. 2), using RSET, the main regulator (LT3081) can deliver +5 V to power either a basic clock, or +15 V to the level-shifted clock and comparator. The LT3081 was chosen as it is inherently stable with any type of load capacitance. Using this power configuration for flexibility, the non-level-shifted clock’s jitter can be measured, or the jitter of the level-shifted clock and comparator can be measured.  A 5-V reference (REF195) is biased in series with a 5-V shunt reference (LT1634B-5). The crystal clock’s supply is powered with 5 V from the REF195. 

2. The LT3081 power supply is configurable for driving one of two possible circuits in the schematic diagram of the test board used to test comparator jitter. (Click top or bottom of image to enlarge)

The clock’s output will swing between 5 and 10 V with respect to ground. The level-shifted clock is applied to the comparator’s inverting terminal.  The non-inverting comparator terminal is connected to +7.5 V, which is produced by placing another 2.5-V shunt reference (ADR5041B) in series with the 5-V shunt reference.

For test purposes, an instrumentation amplifier (AD8220) with unity gain is placed across the crystal clock’s power-supply pins to measure the supply’s stability during clock transitions. The integrated scope test points prevent significant overshoot and ringing on the high-speed edges of the signals from the level-shifted clock and comparator (Fig. 3).

3. CH1 is the output of LM359 discrete comparator and CH2 is the input level-shifted clock; their baselines are coincident with each other.

In order to develop a test method to determine the rms jitter, a Tektronix field applications engineer recommended the “TekScope Anywhere Waveform Analysis Application” to analyze voltage-versus-time data from long record-length captures. Data captures from a Tektronix MSO4034 (a 350-MHz, 2.5-Gsample/s scope) were in their .isf format and the collected file sizes were kept to less than 20 MB, to fit email-attachment memory limits and simplify working at different locations. Both the level-shifted clock and the output of the comparator had .isf files generated by the Tektronix scope.

The signals were ac-coupled to ease scaling of the input-signal traces and make better use of the analog-to-digital converter's input range without clipping. The scope settings included sample rate of 2.50 Gsamples/s, record length of 10 Mpoints, V (clock) of 700 mV/div, V (comparator) of 1.8 V/div, time base of 100 μs/div, and ac coupling on each channel. The trigger method involved Trigger-B sequence Trigger Follow by n events, with n = 1000 events.  If just an edge trigger were used, the scope triggering would try to compensate for jitter at the trigger point.  (The typical jitter specification for an MDO4000 series unit, probably similar to the MSO4000 series, is less than 10 ps rms for edge-type triggers).  The chosen trigger method likely reduced the effect of the instrument’s trigger jitter.

4. In the merged results of the Tektronix "TekScope Anywhere" application, the top graphic is the input clock along with its histogram (the standard deviation of the input clock is 14.4 ps), while the bottom graphic shows comparator output and its histogram (the standard deviation of the comparator output is 27.1 ps).

The Tektronix application was used to generate the data and plots from .isf files collected on the MSO scope, and the data was processed for standard deviation and peak-to-peak jitter. Based on the 3998 clock-period samples captured, a histogram was plotted and merged with the results from the application (Fig. 4).  The upper graph is the measured period versus time, and shows that a few spikes occurred in the data at random sampling times; these will produce "outliers" in a histogram (the second graph).

The measured jitter performance of the comparator—just 23-ps rms jitter at one standard deviation with a 1-MHz input clock—exceeded design expectations. It was determined using the following equation with time in picoseconds (the jitter performance of the scope is not included):

The conclusion was that it is feasible to build a simple test PCB and collect jitter data from a high-performance circuit, if a good digital scope such as the Tektronix unit is available. The jitter results showed this comparator could work with the colleague’s ultrasound application.  

Reference

1. “Dual Comparators Match Precision Industrial, Instrumentation Application Needs,” Electronic Design.

Looking for parts? Go to SourceESB.

Sponsored Recommendations

Understanding Thermal Challenges in EV Charging Applications

March 28, 2024
As EVs emerge as the dominant mode of transportation, factors such as battery range and quicker charging rates will play pivotal roles in the global economy.

Board-Mount DC/DC Converters in Medical Applications

March 27, 2024
AC/DC or board-mount DC/DC converters provide power for medical devices. This article explains why isolation might be needed and which safety standards apply.

Use Rugged Multiband Antennas to Solve the Mobile Connectivity Challenge

March 27, 2024
Selecting and using antennas for mobile applications requires attention to electrical, mechanical, and environmental characteristics: TE modules can help.

Out-of-the-box Cellular and Wi-Fi connectivity with AWS IoT ExpressLink

March 27, 2024
This demo shows how to enroll LTE-M and Wi-Fi evaluation boards with AWS IoT Core, set up a Connected Health Solution as well as AWS AT commands and AWS IoT ExpressLink security...

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!