Latest from Test & Measurement

27253616 © Nomisg | dreamstime.com
dreamstime_nomisg_27253616_promo
ID 319909889 © Media Whalestock | Dreamstime.com
Needles on automatic test equipment
Cabe Atwell and Dreamstime_psstockfoto_45092862
dreamstime_psstockfoto_45092862
Dreamstime_svetlanadiacenco_325233820 and LEM
dreamstime_svetlanadiacenco_325233820_promo
ID 322271709 © Cherezoff | Dreamstime.com
roboticarm_dreamstime_l_322271709
Herbert James Winterstern (movie poster)
promo1920x1080
ID 77960135 © Zorandim | Dreamstime.com
promo_id_77960135__zorandim__dreamstime
Dreamstime_jaeyoungju_216608494
66bcff26489bbdbe458af1ea Autotechnology Dreamstime Jaeyoungju 216608494

EMC Testing: Can It Untangle the Future of In-Car Connectivity? (Download)

Aug. 14, 2024
Log in to download this free PDF article about untangling EMC testing

Read this article online.

On the road to higher levels of autonomous driving, automakers are integrating more and higher-resolution sensors into their vehicles. This has resulted in an unprecedented number of high-bandwidth links under the hood, many of them used to connect safety-critical advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). The problem, though, is that each of them is highly susceptible to the effects of electromagnetic interference (EMI).

To ensure electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) under the hood, automakers have long leaned on standard tests developed by industry groups, including CISPR, ISO, and SAE, to enhance the reliability of the cables that keep the car’s subsystems connected. These tests were developed in the era of legacy connectivity, when frequency topped out at the tens of MHz, with maximum data rates of 100 MB/s.

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!